• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Uncategorized

Save the Pie for Dessert

It’s July 2nd, which means 85% of your American colleagues are “working remotely,” which in practice means their laptops are open while they argue about who forgot to buy charcoal. So it feels like the perfect week to talk about something equally overused and underperforming: pie charts. You know, those colorful disks everyone loves to […]

Learn More July 2, 2025

Stop Dangling the Baby Seal. The Science Against Half-Told Stories

I came across a ‘best-practice’ guide for storytelling whose main recommendation is to write what they dub, Incomplete Stories.  This is garbage advice. That’s my hot take. And if you look at the evidence, it’s not just hot, it’s accurate. The incomplete story isn’t a new idea, it’s a lightly sanitized version of the fly-laden […]

Learn More June 30, 2025

The Cigar Box Checkout: Why Your Donation Page May Be Killing Your Campaigns

Imagine this: You’re in a checkout line. It’s long, sure, but you’ve waited. You’re ready. You’ve got your items in hand, maybe a kid tugging your sleeve, maybe a dog in the car. And when you get to the front of the line, the clerk pulls out a cigar box. She counts change by hand. […]

Learn More June 27, 2025

Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

Did you actually plan the outline of your fundraising appeal—or just let it happen to you?  We’ve been diagramming appeal structures lately, not to make art but to make a point. Take a look at these two outlines from actual appeals: Same audience and mission, different structure.   Which of these seems to follow a more […]

Learn More June 25, 2025

Is Your Personalization = N/A?

Three spec sheets, we’ll let you guess which one is ours.  The more relevant guess for fundraising, which of these is more likely to match the person reading it – yellow, green or purple?  At least the “Personalization: N/A” —isn’t even trying to pretend.  The  “4CP INKJET”  is adopting a fake it until you make approach […]

Learn More June 23, 2025

The Donor Newsletter Is Dead. Long Live The Donor Newsletter.

Tom Ahern’s newsletter just landed in my inbox again. I treat it like a gold-embossed invitation to the attic of good sense and bright ideas. Not dusty. Not precious. Just sharp, useful, and often—like this week—unexpectedly timely. [Subscribe Free here.] This issue, Tom tells the story of Remo, a Twin Cities artist who leans heavily […]

Learn More June 20, 2025

When Everything Is Volume, Nothing Is Value

Economics has long been called the dismal science. Behavioral Economics was the rebellion, a corrective to the fantasy of rational actors making perfectly calculated choices in a frictionless world. The rebels had a point. But they also have their own problems: namely, the replication crisis. Turns out their shiny new hammer sometimes just hits different […]

Learn More June 18, 2025

Donor Trust 2025: The Alarming Data–and What Fundraisers Should Do Now

Once again, the data is in—and once again, too many in our sector are whistling past the graveyard. The newly-released 2025 Donor Trust Report from the BBB Wise Giving Alliance should be a wake-up call. A loud one. The kind with a clanging bell that jolts us out of the comfortable denial we’ve lived in […]

Learn More June 13, 2025

What’s Your EMI Score? And Why It Should Matter to Your Brand

A new study in Nature Human Behaviour analyzed 145 years of U.S. congressional speeches using a linguistic framework called the EMI score, short for Evidence Minus Intuition. Here’s the premise: Language exists on a continuum between two rhetorical styles: Evidence-based: Words like fact, data, proof, reason, research, statistics Intuition-based: Words like feel, believe, opinion, gut, […]

Learn More June 11, 2025

The $30 Copy Change: How Personality-Tuned Messaging Pays

A new study adds to what we’ve been saying and likely rings intuitively true: Tailored messages work better. In four large-scale experiments with nearly 1,800 people, researchers tested tailoring messages in three different ways to match a person’s: Personality Moral values Political ideology They tested matched vs. mismatched and matched vs. generic.  In all cases, […]

Learn More June 9, 2025

<< 1 … 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 … 180 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    DonorVoice products

    Commitment System

    Donor Feedback Platform™

    PreTest Tool

    TouchPoint Mapping



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!