• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Breaking Out of the Status Quo

Fundraising’s Silver Bullet

Tom just weighed in from summertime New Zealand with the suggestion that we once again take up the important subject of donor service. He accompanied his suggestion with this quote from Seth Godin. “Reactive customer service waits until something is broken. We leave it up to the annoyed customer to go to the trouble of […]

Learn More February 12, 2018

Why “Trust” Matters in Fundraising. And What To Do About It.

The 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer reveals that trust in the U.S. has suffered the largest-ever-recorded drop in the survey’s history among the general population. Even more troubling, trust among the informed public (that would be our donors)  in the U.S. imploded, plunging 23 points to 45, making it now the lowest of the 28 countries surveyed— below […]

Learn More February 9, 2018

Is donor feedback a census or a sample?

You want to find out who is going to be the next president.  You don’t talk to every likely (or eligible) voter – too expensive.  Instead, you find a representative sample of Americans, ask them and extrapolate, building in error percentage for this extrapolation. This type of sampling is mighty.  You can learn what segments […]

Learn More February 8, 2018

Testing Your Donor Identities

Previously on donor identity: It’s good to segment by identity But they must be the right identity/ies There must be meaningful differences among different identities And you must be able to get value by messaging them differently So, how do you know if you get value by messaging differently?  You must test. Sorry.  I wish […]

Learn More

Brainstorming Donor Identities

I’ve been preaching testing donor identities as ways of segmentation your file even in my pre-Agitator days.  But here’s a secret: not all donor identities are created equal. Remember that the goal of a good segmentation – including an identity segmentation – is to minimize difference among group members and to maximize difference among different […]

Learn More February 7, 2018

Instinct and Conventional Wisdom Are No Longer Enough

A variety of recent news items crossed our desk that bear on what we’ll explore this week –”segmentation”. ITEM:  Civil Society in the UK reports in Top Charities See Largest Fall for Voluntary Income in 20 Years that the top 100 charities have recorded their most sustained drop in voluntary contributions in two decades. ITEM: […]

Learn More February 5, 2018

Don’t Just Turn Down The Volume

The TL/DR  (Too Long, Didn’t Read) version of this week’s posts has been: Volume is not a strategy. Not for retention.  Not for net income.  And especially not for donor satisfaction. Now the painful truth: Lack of volume is also not a strategy. Cutting volume, as many organizations have done successfully, is a great tactic as […]

Learn More February 2, 2018

Ikea’s lesson for fundraisers

You may have heard that the Ingvar Kamprad, the founder of Ikea, passed away this weekend. His legacy is much more than the bookcases in my offices.  One of the more obscure parts of an Ikea legacy is a cognitive bias called the Ikea Effect. Side note: you must be ingrained in the popular culture […]

Learn More February 1, 2018

Volume Has Been Tested. The Results Are In

Yesterday, I vented my spleen about the argument that volume leads to retention and that the volume of contact should be viewed as the lever to do so. Now, I’d like to put my case studies where my mouth is. Most of these are specific to mail.  Why?  Because that’s where the testing has been […]

Learn More January 31, 2018

How Not to Test Communication Volume

I’m a fan of M+R.  Their free nonprofit tool shed is great for quick calculations for those who, like me, can’t do chi-square or t-tests, in their heads.  Their yearly benchmarks are a must read every year.  (And they are adding retention to it, which is a great addition.)  They are also more open about […]

Learn More January 30, 2018

<< 1 … 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 … 168 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q: As a designer who works with non-profits on fundraising strategy, I see the language like the following: “Our supporters help empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs.” I do not think the word “help” is useful–I think “Our supporters empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs. ” is much more engaging. Thoughts?

    Whether “help” is more engaging or not really depends on the framing and context. The word help can sometimes weaken the perceived agency of the supporter, making their role feel secondary rather than central (your point). On the other hand, help can also signal collaboration rather than implying full ownership of the outcome, which might […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: We started offering a donor cover option last april 1. The data to date suggests this may be dampening giving.eg. those who say yes to donor cover have a lower average gift (based on analysis of 6000+ gifts). I’m wondering if those who give lower gifts feel more guilt and therefore say yes to donor cover or if the presence of donor cover is making people adjust (lower) their gift size to accommodate the extra 3%. Would love any insights you have.

    Great question! Here’s how behavioral science can help unpack what might be happening: Pain of Paying: Even a small extra charge can make giving feel more transactional than emotional, potentially reducing generosity. Fairness Concerns: Some donors might perceive donor cover as a surcharge rather than a contribution to the cause. If they feel the charity […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: When writing an appeal, I waffle back and forth between writing “Your gift CAN…” or “Your gift WILL…” Any studies of which of these two words is best for an appeal?

    The choice between “Your gift CAN…” and “Your gift WILL…” taps into the psychological framing of certainty vs. possibility. Currently, there is no academic research directly comparing these two framings in charitable appeals. However, I suspect no framing is universally better—the outcome likely depends on your target audience and the campaign’s goal. Here are some thoughts: Certainty Framing – […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Do you have any insight on whether integrating an individual giving appeal with other comms from the charity in both appearance and messaging can uplift results? Or does the actual appeal become ‘lost’ for lack of stand-out?

    Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Is there any research on response rate impact in direct mail when referring to a sustainer gift as ongoing or recurring (catching all frequencies) v. monthly or annual?

    I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: A major conservation nonprofit sends me lots of mail, many of which have on the envelope “time to renew” or “2nd notice.” I find this practice deceptive, especially as I haven’t given to said organization since 1997. It must be effective or they wouldn’t do it. But is it ethical?

    Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]

    Read Full Answer

    DonorVoice products

    Commitment System

    Donor Feedback Platform™

    PreTest Tool

    TouchPoint Mapping



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2025, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!