• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Uncategorized

Saving your donor file with science-based design

Earlier this month, Cancer Research UK (CRUK) reported on its efforts to convert to an opt-in only organization: 80% have not actively opted in to receiving mail 55% have not actively opted in to receiving email At least 91% have not actively opted in to receiving a phone call. Wow. We knew retention is low, […]

Learn More November 16, 2017

Beware costly mistakes in segmentation

DonorVoice’s Charlie Hulme did an excellent piece with SOFII about five mistakes you can make in segmentation.  Well worth a read!

Learn More November 14, 2017

Facing the Faceboopocalypse

The Facebook app will now have an explore feed and a news feed. News will be limited largely to actual friends and paid advertisements. The explore feed will the Facebook ghetto, where your Giving Tuesday post will go to languish unless you pay them to promote it. You may recognize this business model from this […]

Learn More November 9, 2017

Six ways your donors are different from each other (and three ways they aren’t)

Thank you to Venngage for the design of this wonderful infographic!

Learn More November 3, 2017

Bursting the Organization-Centric Bubble

If you still believe—or even worse, tout the fact– that your organization is the end-all and be-all this will burst your organization-centric bubble. A study just released by The Blackbaud Institute titled Vital Signs: Monitoring Giving Patterns in the Donor Marketplace concludes that… “…American donors are more valuable to American nonprofit organizations than the organizations […]

Learn More November 1, 2017

DonorVoice House of Horrors 1: A Donor’s Lament

by Edgar Allan Poe’s less-talented brother Elwood Once upon a midday happy, I awoke from noontime nappy Rousing from my squishy armchair as I had begun to snore Suddenly I heard a binging, a soft electronic dinging As if a bell had been ringing, ringing from my email store “Tis some email” lo I muttered, […]

Learn More October 26, 2017

Don’t let bad donor intelligence jam you up

You may have heard the article of faith that donor surveys only give you misleading information. That statement is half right: bad donor surveys are bad. But, as you make have guessed, good surveys are not only good but essential. But first, you must get past the jam trap. (This can involve complex technical names […]

Learn More

Constructing a donor identity: an NRA case study

Who people are is an integral part of why they give. Your most loyal donors are the ones who wouldn’t dream of leaving, because being a member/supporter/donor to you is a part of who they are. Some of these are simple. Disease charities can segment by whether the disease directly impacted the donor. For animal […]

Learn More October 19, 2017

The Perfect E-Commerce Page

The most basic attribute of good fundraising webpages is simplicity — don’t ask for anything extraneous to ‘closing the sale’, pre-populate donor information when available, require as few clicks as possible. Make it easy, easy, easy. I figure a good online fundraiser could probably come up with a list of 10 or a dozen ‘must […]

Learn More October 17, 2017

Nudging toward donations: a Nobel pursuit

Richard Thaler just won the Nobel Prize in Economics*.  This is momentous for two reasons: He is the first economics Nobel Prize winner to have a Bacon number of 2: he was in The Big Short with Ryan Gosling, Marisa Tomei, and Steve Carrell, who were all in Crazy. Stupid. Love. with Kevin Bacon.** It’s continued […]

Learn More October 12, 2017

<< 1 … 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 … 168 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q: As a designer who works with non-profits on fundraising strategy, I see the language like the following: “Our supporters help empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs.” I do not think the word “help” is useful–I think “Our supporters empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs. ” is much more engaging. Thoughts?

    Whether “help” is more engaging or not really depends on the framing and context. The word help can sometimes weaken the perceived agency of the supporter, making their role feel secondary rather than central (your point). On the other hand, help can also signal collaboration rather than implying full ownership of the outcome, which might […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: We started offering a donor cover option last april 1. The data to date suggests this may be dampening giving.eg. those who say yes to donor cover have a lower average gift (based on analysis of 6000+ gifts). I’m wondering if those who give lower gifts feel more guilt and therefore say yes to donor cover or if the presence of donor cover is making people adjust (lower) their gift size to accommodate the extra 3%. Would love any insights you have.

    Great question! Here’s how behavioral science can help unpack what might be happening: Pain of Paying: Even a small extra charge can make giving feel more transactional than emotional, potentially reducing generosity. Fairness Concerns: Some donors might perceive donor cover as a surcharge rather than a contribution to the cause. If they feel the charity […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: When writing an appeal, I waffle back and forth between writing “Your gift CAN…” or “Your gift WILL…” Any studies of which of these two words is best for an appeal?

    The choice between “Your gift CAN…” and “Your gift WILL…” taps into the psychological framing of certainty vs. possibility. Currently, there is no academic research directly comparing these two framings in charitable appeals. However, I suspect no framing is universally better—the outcome likely depends on your target audience and the campaign’s goal. Here are some thoughts: Certainty Framing – […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Do you have any insight on whether integrating an individual giving appeal with other comms from the charity in both appearance and messaging can uplift results? Or does the actual appeal become ‘lost’ for lack of stand-out?

    Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Is there any research on response rate impact in direct mail when referring to a sustainer gift as ongoing or recurring (catching all frequencies) v. monthly or annual?

    I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: A major conservation nonprofit sends me lots of mail, many of which have on the envelope “time to renew” or “2nd notice.” I find this practice deceptive, especially as I haven’t given to said organization since 1997. It must be effective or they wouldn’t do it. But is it ethical?

    Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]

    Read Full Answer

    DonorVoice products

    Commitment System

    Donor Feedback Platform™

    PreTest Tool

    TouchPoint Mapping



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2025, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!