• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Uncategorized

Giving Tuesday and the when versus why of giving

I like the idea of Giving Tuesday very much – there needs to be a day (actually, more than one) dedicated to giving. That’s why it frustrates me that we are killing it. And not killing it in the sense of “doing very well.”* “Killing it” in the sense of making it unable to survive. […]

Learn More November 30, 2016

What’s in your leaky bucket(s)?

Our friends over at Bloomerang have a good post up here that argues we shouldn’t put all our donors into one bucket, sending “the file” undifferentiated communications.  Absolutely right on. They also list out 20 segments that, for starters, you can use to differentiate your file.  Great!  And it’s only a start. And there’s been […]

Learn More November 23, 2016

Happy Thanksgiving!

We are grateful for the time you give The Agitator. We are grateful for your thoughts and Comments. We are grateful for the work you do for Others. We are grateful for YOU. Happy Thanksgiving! Roger and Tom P.S. And if you’re one of our non-U.S. readers, thanks for giving us a few days off! We’ll […]

Learn More

Alfred Hitchcock: nonprofit fundraiser

At the movies today, when you can see a robot punch an alien in the head in dizzying 3D, it’s interesting to remember more intimate things that race our pulse and stand up our neck hairs. The idea that your neighbor could be a killer, that he’s in the house, and your leg is broken. […]

Learn More November 17, 2016

Seven things you can stop doing today in direct marketing

I wish I knew what they were. Don’t get me wrong: there are seven things you can stop doing today in your direct marketing program and it will have little to no impact.  I just don’t know what they are yet. I was re-reading Power of Habit the other day and a case study jumped out […]

Learn More November 10, 2016

What’s Next?

We all woke up on this post-election morning to uncertainty and turmoil. What does the election of Donald Trump mean? Of course, no one really knows. Fear, anger, hope, disappointment, rage and joy bounce off our collective emotional wall. Those of us in progressive advocacy fundraising view President-elect Trump as the Orange Menace. Civil liberties, […]

Learn More November 9, 2016

New free white paper on setting up a multi-gift program

We have a new white paper out on how to get more out of fewer asks. One solution to how to raise more money for your organization is to communicate with your donors more. The other — cheaper and better in the long run — is to set up a regular giving program that invites […]

Learn More November 1, 2016

Running the numbers on retention for fun and profit

On Tuesday, our friends at the Agitator exposed the innumeracy of some when it comes to calculating retention and covered how to calculate it. That’s a good first step toward benchmarking your retention numbers. And I have to confess that I have seen such fuzzy retention math even in the hallowed halls of learned conferences. One […]

Learn More October 27, 2016

The Curse of Testing Illiteracy

Spurred on by my post The Curse of Fundraising Innumeracy, reader Mikaela King over at the National Geographic Society decided to “dog pile” on with what she termed “another illiteracy” in our sector — testing illiteracy. Mikaela noted, “A lack of discipline in conducting accurate A/B split testing, truly ensuring randomized segments, making sure your test segments are large […]

Learn More October 26, 2016

What happens if you listen to your donors TOO POORLY

Let me get this out of the way first: I’m a Jeff Brooks fan. I grew up in direct marketing with his Fundraising is Beautiful podcast* and Future Fundraising Now blog. I’ll always remember my first blog post where I said to my wife that Jeff Brooks linked to me in the same tone of […]

Learn More October 18, 2016

<< 1 … 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 … 168 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q: As a designer who works with non-profits on fundraising strategy, I see the language like the following: “Our supporters help empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs.” I do not think the word “help” is useful–I think “Our supporters empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs. ” is much more engaging. Thoughts?

    Whether “help” is more engaging or not really depends on the framing and context. The word help can sometimes weaken the perceived agency of the supporter, making their role feel secondary rather than central (your point). On the other hand, help can also signal collaboration rather than implying full ownership of the outcome, which might […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: We started offering a donor cover option last april 1. The data to date suggests this may be dampening giving.eg. those who say yes to donor cover have a lower average gift (based on analysis of 6000+ gifts). I’m wondering if those who give lower gifts feel more guilt and therefore say yes to donor cover or if the presence of donor cover is making people adjust (lower) their gift size to accommodate the extra 3%. Would love any insights you have.

    Great question! Here’s how behavioral science can help unpack what might be happening: Pain of Paying: Even a small extra charge can make giving feel more transactional than emotional, potentially reducing generosity. Fairness Concerns: Some donors might perceive donor cover as a surcharge rather than a contribution to the cause. If they feel the charity […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: When writing an appeal, I waffle back and forth between writing “Your gift CAN…” or “Your gift WILL…” Any studies of which of these two words is best for an appeal?

    The choice between “Your gift CAN…” and “Your gift WILL…” taps into the psychological framing of certainty vs. possibility. Currently, there is no academic research directly comparing these two framings in charitable appeals. However, I suspect no framing is universally better—the outcome likely depends on your target audience and the campaign’s goal. Here are some thoughts: Certainty Framing – […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Do you have any insight on whether integrating an individual giving appeal with other comms from the charity in both appearance and messaging can uplift results? Or does the actual appeal become ‘lost’ for lack of stand-out?

    Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Is there any research on response rate impact in direct mail when referring to a sustainer gift as ongoing or recurring (catching all frequencies) v. monthly or annual?

    I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: A major conservation nonprofit sends me lots of mail, many of which have on the envelope “time to renew” or “2nd notice.” I find this practice deceptive, especially as I haven’t given to said organization since 1997. It must be effective or they wouldn’t do it. But is it ethical?

    Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]

    Read Full Answer

    DonorVoice products

    Commitment System

    Donor Feedback Platform™

    PreTest Tool

    TouchPoint Mapping



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2025, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!