• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Uncategorized

New free science of opt-in white paper

We have a new white paper out on the science of getting people to opt-in. The resources include: – Trends in opt-in only marketing – Why opted-in donors and constituents are more valuable. – How lessons from organ donation programs can increase your opt-in rates. – Why opting in isn’t just for online communications. – […]

Learn More October 17, 2016

Why I was wrong on mail quantity

Once upon a time (OK, it was back in May; time moves pretty fast in the direct marketing world), I wrote that quantity of mail volume is not the problem that some people thought it was.  Basically, if you had a magic box that you put $1 into and got $1.10 out of it, you […]

Learn More October 6, 2016

Slut-shaming And Charitable Regulation

My only question this morning:  “Is all this really happening?” First, my inbox and social media was bombarded with news that somewhere between 3:20 a.m. and 5:00 a.m. Friday  a 70 year-old man with 5 children went ape shit on Twitter, slut-shaming Miss Universe of 1996. Next, my inbox bell rings with news that the Charities […]

Learn More October 3, 2016

New free peer-to-peer webinars

Please join us on Wednesday, October 19, for the second Peer-to-Peer World Virtual Conference!  DonorVoice and three other companies that serve nonprofits have come together to share our experience with and knowledge of peer-to-peer fundraising.  In one day, at no charge, you’ll learn how to: Improve your donors’ experience Modernize your approach to data Raise more […]

Learn More September 28, 2016

New free ask string white paper and webinar

Wanted to let you know quickly about two new free resources: We have a new white paper up called The Science of Ask Strings.  It walks through donor psychology, how to set your ask string goals, and how to use behavioral science to get the results you want.  It’s a free download here. Thanks to […]

Learn More September 14, 2016

Three free Webinars in September 2016

Not only are we humans irrational, but we are irrational in predictable ways, with biases baked into our brains’ operating systems.  Behavioral science can get more people to do better things without force or coercion – simply designing better choices can make a big difference. These set of three free Webinars will address how to […]

Learn More September 7, 2016

The Neglected Gold Mine of Lapsed Donors

I’m glad Tom raised the issue of ‘lapsed’ donors in his post,  When To Give Up On A Donor.  The issue of seemingly inactive or financially unproductive donors receives to little serious attention. In the direct response part of the trade, ‘lapsed’ donors are too often mechanistically shoved into various RFM buckets with little understanding […]

Learn More August 29, 2016

For Fundraiser Introverts

Which way would you have it …? Fundraisers should be introverts, because this more introspective personality type would be better suited for getting ‘inside the heads’ of donors and tapping their core emotional motivations. Or, Fundraisers should be extroverts, because they are more naturally equipped with the engagement skills that would better attune them to […]

Learn More August 19, 2016

Fundraising As A Driver Of Social Justice

On a hot August afternoon 46 years ago I dropped my first direct mail campaign at the main post office in Washington, D.C. The 250,000 envelopes contained a six-page letter that began “Everybody’s organized but the people…” announcing the formation of a new “citizens lobby” called Common Cause. It was a big gamble. Few organizations […]

Learn More August 17, 2016

Being donor-centric is not function of volume (even though volume biz model horribly broken)

Let’s be provocative from the start; donor-centricity used to be an empty, vacuous, platitude. This, in and of itself, is not a big deal and in fact preferable to the definitions that seem to be filling the empty, vacuous void. First and foremost, volume (i.e. cadence) seems to have quickly stepped in to become “a”, […]

Learn More May 16, 2016

<< 1 … 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 … 168 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q: As a designer who works with non-profits on fundraising strategy, I see the language like the following: “Our supporters help empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs.” I do not think the word “help” is useful–I think “Our supporters empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs. ” is much more engaging. Thoughts?

    Whether “help” is more engaging or not really depends on the framing and context. The word help can sometimes weaken the perceived agency of the supporter, making their role feel secondary rather than central (your point). On the other hand, help can also signal collaboration rather than implying full ownership of the outcome, which might […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: We started offering a donor cover option last april 1. The data to date suggests this may be dampening giving.eg. those who say yes to donor cover have a lower average gift (based on analysis of 6000+ gifts). I’m wondering if those who give lower gifts feel more guilt and therefore say yes to donor cover or if the presence of donor cover is making people adjust (lower) their gift size to accommodate the extra 3%. Would love any insights you have.

    Great question! Here’s how behavioral science can help unpack what might be happening: Pain of Paying: Even a small extra charge can make giving feel more transactional than emotional, potentially reducing generosity. Fairness Concerns: Some donors might perceive donor cover as a surcharge rather than a contribution to the cause. If they feel the charity […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: When writing an appeal, I waffle back and forth between writing “Your gift CAN…” or “Your gift WILL…” Any studies of which of these two words is best for an appeal?

    The choice between “Your gift CAN…” and “Your gift WILL…” taps into the psychological framing of certainty vs. possibility. Currently, there is no academic research directly comparing these two framings in charitable appeals. However, I suspect no framing is universally better—the outcome likely depends on your target audience and the campaign’s goal. Here are some thoughts: Certainty Framing – […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Do you have any insight on whether integrating an individual giving appeal with other comms from the charity in both appearance and messaging can uplift results? Or does the actual appeal become ‘lost’ for lack of stand-out?

    Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Is there any research on response rate impact in direct mail when referring to a sustainer gift as ongoing or recurring (catching all frequencies) v. monthly or annual?

    I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: A major conservation nonprofit sends me lots of mail, many of which have on the envelope “time to renew” or “2nd notice.” I find this practice deceptive, especially as I haven’t given to said organization since 1997. It must be effective or they wouldn’t do it. But is it ethical?

    Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]

    Read Full Answer

    DonorVoice products

    Commitment System

    Donor Feedback Platform™

    PreTest Tool

    TouchPoint Mapping



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2025, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!