• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Uncategorized

If Your Strategy Works for the ‘Average Donor,’ It Works for No One

We treat the average gift like gospel – reporting, obsessing and buidling decks on it.  That would make sense if donor behavior followed a nice, clean bell curve, tall in the middle, tapering on both ends. In that world, averages matter. Standard deviation matters. Outliers? They’re noise. But your donor data probably doesn’t live in […]

Learn More May 2, 2025

Short Sentences Didn’t Kill Good Writing, Lazy Ones Did

Sentences have gotten shorter. Way shorter.  In the 1700s, the average English sentence ambled along for 40–50 words like a drunk uncle telling a fishing story. Today, we average 15–20 words before we feel the need to hit “period” and move on with our lives. This isn’t some “vibe shift” it’s measurable.  Sentence lengths have […]

Learn More April 30, 2025

The Contagion of Giving

We don’t usually review children’s books here at The Agitator. But today, we make an exception—not out of novelty, but necessity. We’re All in This Together: Leo’s Lunchbox, a new picture book written by Senator Raphael Warnock and illustrated by TeMika Grooms,  might seem like a simple tale for little ones: a boy shares his […]

Learn More April 28, 2025

Are You Fundraising Like a Cable News Channel?

The echo chamber is getting louder, we tune out damn near everything that doesn’t match what we already believe and we’re much more likely to distrust anyone not like us.  Partisan agreement between spouses was around 60% in the mid 60’s, it’s now closer to 85%.  Pew research shows partisans have few friends from the […]

Learn More April 25, 2025

Trump and the Sistine Chapel Playbook

It’s the day after Earth Day, and if you’re not already furious, allow me to help. Donald Trump is once again treating the IRS like a blunt-force weapon, threatening to revoke the tax-exempt status of Harvard—yes, Harvard—under the camouflage of “fighting antisemitism.” That’s rich, considering the administration’s actual gripe seems to be that Harvard wouldn’t […]

Learn More April 23, 2025

Ask Avoidance Isn’t a Donor Defect, It’s a Design Problem

When a donor doesn’t give, we usually default to two explanations: The timing must’ve been off. We didn’t make it emotional enough. The fix? Try again. Ask harder, add more urgency., insert a sadder story. But behavioral science tells us something else might be going on: people avoid emotionally triggering fundraising not because it wasn’t […]

Learn More April 21, 2025

The Model That Knows When To Shut Up

Most fundraising models rely on a simple set of assumptions: Recency means readiness Frequency means loyalty Bigger gifts mean bigger love And that all this adds up to a reliable way to pick who gets your next fundraising appeal.  But here’s what most models don’t ask:  What happens when you actually market to someone?  Did […]

Learn More April 16, 2025

Best Practice Is Just Peer Pressure in a Blazer

There’s this belief in our sector that the quicker we ask the better off we are. This applies to the frequency of the appeals, but also within a given appeal. Best practice only exists to be challenged and replaced. A case in point, we analyzed thousands of tele fundraising calls done by our team to […]

Learn More April 14, 2025

DON’T EAT THE SEED CORN: A Checklist for Fundraisers in Tough Times

Let’s not sugarcoat it. Economic turbulence is here—and it’s got teeth. The stock market’s sliding, anxiety’s rising, and if history is any guide, fundraisers are bracing for another punch in the gut. I’ve been working in the fundraising trade for more than 60 years. That means I’ve lived and worked through every recession since 1960—and […]

Learn More April 11, 2025

Why Your Best Appeal Is Failing 80% of the Time

We ran a test, five versions of a fundraising letter.  Each one told the same story about the same woman — her loss of sight, her journey to get it back, and how donors made it possible.  What changed? The way the story was told was tailored to match the personality of the reader. The […]

Learn More April 9, 2025

<< 1 … 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 … 180 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    DonorVoice products

    Commitment System

    Donor Feedback Platform™

    PreTest Tool

    TouchPoint Mapping



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!