• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Uncategorized

Loyalty 360

This Week in Loyalty is a loyalty newsletter that shows some promise. From an outfit called Loyalty 360 — “The loyalty marketer’s association” — it’s aimed at commercial marketers from what I’ve seen so far. Still, it offers links to case studies and loyalty marketing initiatives, as well as other blogs on the subject, we […]

Learn More June 18, 2012

What the heck is a life-stage? Or is it lifecycle or maybe lifecycle stage?

This is another very trendy buzzword (or phrase), one we admittedly use on occasion.   It is, like most buzz words, grossly over and misused.  This is one of those terms that is easier to define by starting with the anti-definitions – i.e. what it is not. But, before we jump into that list of “what […]

Learn More June 15, 2012

Life After Fundraising

“Life after fundraising” doesn’t mean you stop trying to save the world. Take the example of one of our favorite fundraising veterans, Mal Warwick. Mal ‘dropped out’ of fundraising a couple of years ago to devote his energies to One World Futbol. We’ll let his latest update speak for itself … Hi, Folks! I’m writing […]

Learn More June 1, 2012

The Value of Non-Responders

There is a great write up in Harvard Business Review about an experiment to evaluate the sales lift from coupons – not just among the redeemers (the obvious part) but also, the non-redeemers. How do coupons deliver sales lift among non-redeemers?  Most probably know or can guess the answer and it is the exact same […]

Learn More May 11, 2012

How to Map the Donor Experience

The word “mapping” has received a lot of buzz lately.  We’re unclear how much of this is real versus PowerPoint fodder and welcome any feedback on this open question. Our latest innovation, TouchPoint Mapping, is, as you can see, an actual map using an online platform built exclusively for this purpose and with the non-profit […]

Learn More March 22, 2012

Donor Segmentation – Why, How and What to Mail.

At DonorVoice we do a lot of segmentation work.  In our previous lives we did even more.  We love segmenting, slicing and dicing…And yet, we have seen far too many poorly conceived segmentation schemes and an equal number of well conceived ones that never get implemented.  Heck, we’ve even participated in both scenarios and hopefully […]

Learn More January 18, 2012

Listening To Agitator Readers

Thanks for the great response to last week’s Agitator reader survey. We’ve gotten heaps of advice to think about … and some nice compliments too. So … who are you? If there’s such a thing as the ‘average’ Agitator reader, you are most likely to be a direct response fundraiser, in ‘the business’ for 4-10 years, […]

Learn More January 16, 2012

Word of Mouth – Who Does It and Why?

Word of mouth is, especially these days, considered the best form of advertising and promotion. It is inexpensive (not free) and often reported by peers as the most trusted, most acted on form of referral. Social media of course has elevated word of mouth or peer influence to rock star status. It is often useful, […]

Learn More January 10, 2012

The Agitator’s Christmas Tradition

Here is The Agitator’s most enduring (only?) tradition. For our fifth Christmas, we urge you to get into a mirthful holiday mood by listening to this unforgettable rendition of O Holy Night. Tom is especially fond of this performance, as it takes him back to Midnight Mass and his Catholic grammar school choir days. We […]

Learn More December 22, 2011

Get the Report Ken Burnett Called Breakthrough and start increasing retention.

The DonorVoice point of view is quite simple; until non-profits focus as much on donor attitudes as they do behaviors, they will never fix the retention problem.  And until retention is addressed, non-profits will forever be dealing with a leakier bucket, one that cannot be re-filled fast enough. Why attitudes? Donor attitudes dictate why donors […]

Learn More November 11, 2011

<< 1 … 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 … 168 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q: As a designer who works with non-profits on fundraising strategy, I see the language like the following: “Our supporters help empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs.” I do not think the word “help” is useful–I think “Our supporters empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs. ” is much more engaging. Thoughts?

    Whether “help” is more engaging or not really depends on the framing and context. The word help can sometimes weaken the perceived agency of the supporter, making their role feel secondary rather than central (your point). On the other hand, help can also signal collaboration rather than implying full ownership of the outcome, which might […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: We started offering a donor cover option last april 1. The data to date suggests this may be dampening giving.eg. those who say yes to donor cover have a lower average gift (based on analysis of 6000+ gifts). I’m wondering if those who give lower gifts feel more guilt and therefore say yes to donor cover or if the presence of donor cover is making people adjust (lower) their gift size to accommodate the extra 3%. Would love any insights you have.

    Great question! Here’s how behavioral science can help unpack what might be happening: Pain of Paying: Even a small extra charge can make giving feel more transactional than emotional, potentially reducing generosity. Fairness Concerns: Some donors might perceive donor cover as a surcharge rather than a contribution to the cause. If they feel the charity […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: When writing an appeal, I waffle back and forth between writing “Your gift CAN…” or “Your gift WILL…” Any studies of which of these two words is best for an appeal?

    The choice between “Your gift CAN…” and “Your gift WILL…” taps into the psychological framing of certainty vs. possibility. Currently, there is no academic research directly comparing these two framings in charitable appeals. However, I suspect no framing is universally better—the outcome likely depends on your target audience and the campaign’s goal. Here are some thoughts: Certainty Framing – […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Do you have any insight on whether integrating an individual giving appeal with other comms from the charity in both appearance and messaging can uplift results? Or does the actual appeal become ‘lost’ for lack of stand-out?

    Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Is there any research on response rate impact in direct mail when referring to a sustainer gift as ongoing or recurring (catching all frequencies) v. monthly or annual?

    I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: A major conservation nonprofit sends me lots of mail, many of which have on the envelope “time to renew” or “2nd notice.” I find this practice deceptive, especially as I haven’t given to said organization since 1997. It must be effective or they wouldn’t do it. But is it ethical?

    Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]

    Read Full Answer

    DonorVoice products

    Commitment System

    Donor Feedback Platform™

    PreTest Tool

    TouchPoint Mapping



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2025, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!