• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Uncategorized

Terrific Motivator … Thanks!

We’ve just been updating our Agitator website … specifically the ‘crawl’ that displays some of our subscribers. We’re so far behind the curve on this (with barely a couple hundred subscribing organizations listed, out of several thousand), so we decided to refresh the list going forward by just updating with newly subscribing organizations. Something must […]

Learn More November 9, 2011

Terrific Fundraising Insights

Mark Phillips of UK’s Bluefrog fundraising agency, is a consultant I’d probably hire. I’ve never met him. I’m going strictly on the quality of his insights as expressed on his blog, queer ideas. His recent post, with the dry-as-toast title, Five things we learned at the IFC, is a treasure chest of little pearls (he […]

Learn More October 27, 2011

Donor Behavior AND Donor Attitudes – How they (should) work together.

Donor Behavior vs.AND Donor Attitudes It seems the vast majority of non-profits define loyalty based on past behavior.  And like the financial, Cover Your Ass (CYA) language in all prospectuses reminds us, past behavior is no guarantee of future performance. But neither of course is a purely attitudinal basis for segmenting and understanding your donor […]

Learn More October 24, 2011

The Only Fundraising Question You Should Ask

Two of the biggest technological curses infecting fundraising are Word and Excel. Microsoft might be the archenemy of intelligent fundraising. Word, with its copy and paste function has demeaned and degraded copy to the point where we’ve convinced ourselves that the homogenized gruel we serve our donors is truly good copy. Heaven help us. [I’ve […]

Learn More October 17, 2011

Email Marketing Best Practices

Target Marketing is offering a free (registration required) ‘white paper’ on email marketing best practices. Actually, it’s more of a tip sheet, but valuable nonetheless. I’ll preview their 12 tips, but urge you to get the full paper. Best Practices Write great subject lines. Don’t forget the preview pane! Avoid SPAM language. They offer words […]

Learn More September 12, 2011

It’s A Joke!

I swear … it’s a joke! Hey, Roger and I are working. Tom P.S. Go ahead, take the rest of the week off.

Learn More August 8, 2011

Can You Beat 27 Years?

Over the weekend I learned that an old friend would be retiring from his job after 27 years at the same company. It wasn’t his first job, but certainly his various senior roles within this company defined his career. I believe he is out-served only by the founder, who now luxuriates in the title of […]

Learn More July 11, 2011

Roger Craver Honored

Today my friend, colleague and hero Roger Craver is being inducted into the American Association of Political Consultants Hall of Fame. Here’s what AAPC has to say about Roger … David Broder called him “a bomb thrower”… The Wall Street Journal claimed he was the “assassin” of all things right wing. Many of the household […]

Learn More March 10, 2011

Next Big Thing: Integration

Fundraising Success says: “Looking for the Next Big Thing? We’ve got news for you … no matter what the next cool strategy is that emerges for fundraising, the one and only true Next Big Thing is, was and always will be integration. No matter how good something looks, it can’t stand alone; you have to […]

Learn More February 23, 2011

Go Ahead, Say It!

On Monday, in his No More Mr Nice Guy rant (to which I subscribe) about the inadequacies of present day fundraising, Roger let slip just how long we’ve been at this business … 41 years. And we know many of you are thinking of us as, well, old farts … but are just too polite […]

Learn More January 14, 2011

<< 1 … 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 … 168 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q: As a designer who works with non-profits on fundraising strategy, I see the language like the following: “Our supporters help empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs.” I do not think the word “help” is useful–I think “Our supporters empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs. ” is much more engaging. Thoughts?

    Whether “help” is more engaging or not really depends on the framing and context. The word help can sometimes weaken the perceived agency of the supporter, making their role feel secondary rather than central (your point). On the other hand, help can also signal collaboration rather than implying full ownership of the outcome, which might […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: We started offering a donor cover option last april 1. The data to date suggests this may be dampening giving.eg. those who say yes to donor cover have a lower average gift (based on analysis of 6000+ gifts). I’m wondering if those who give lower gifts feel more guilt and therefore say yes to donor cover or if the presence of donor cover is making people adjust (lower) their gift size to accommodate the extra 3%. Would love any insights you have.

    Great question! Here’s how behavioral science can help unpack what might be happening: Pain of Paying: Even a small extra charge can make giving feel more transactional than emotional, potentially reducing generosity. Fairness Concerns: Some donors might perceive donor cover as a surcharge rather than a contribution to the cause. If they feel the charity […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: When writing an appeal, I waffle back and forth between writing “Your gift CAN…” or “Your gift WILL…” Any studies of which of these two words is best for an appeal?

    The choice between “Your gift CAN…” and “Your gift WILL…” taps into the psychological framing of certainty vs. possibility. Currently, there is no academic research directly comparing these two framings in charitable appeals. However, I suspect no framing is universally better—the outcome likely depends on your target audience and the campaign’s goal. Here are some thoughts: Certainty Framing – […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Do you have any insight on whether integrating an individual giving appeal with other comms from the charity in both appearance and messaging can uplift results? Or does the actual appeal become ‘lost’ for lack of stand-out?

    Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Is there any research on response rate impact in direct mail when referring to a sustainer gift as ongoing or recurring (catching all frequencies) v. monthly or annual?

    I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: A major conservation nonprofit sends me lots of mail, many of which have on the envelope “time to renew” or “2nd notice.” I find this practice deceptive, especially as I haven’t given to said organization since 1997. It must be effective or they wouldn’t do it. But is it ethical?

    Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]

    Read Full Answer

    DonorVoice products

    Commitment System

    Donor Feedback Platform™

    PreTest Tool

    TouchPoint Mapping



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2025, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!