• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Uncategorized

You’re Being Watched. Protect Yourself.

The AFPICON 2025 Conference is coming up soon (April 27-29) and there’s a growing unease among Canadian and other non-US fundraisers—an anxious undercurrent that’s hard to ignore. Many who once eagerly crossed the border for conferences and gatherings now find themselves hesitating. It’s not the logistics of travel or the cost. It’s the climate—the political […]

Learn More April 7, 2025

“Audience-Led” Is the New Low Bar. Time to Raise It.

“Audience-led” sounds strategic. But too often, it just means sorting your file by lifecycle stage, giving level, or age group — and sending slightly different versions of the same thing.  It’s like a choose-your-own-adventure where every path ends with the same appeal, just in a different font. Different ≠ Deeper Yes, coordinating across channels is […]

Learn More April 4, 2025

Your Fundraising Team Needs a Robot With The Right Personality

Fundraising is communication. Communication is psychology. Psychology is trait-driven. And now… fundraising is also AI-driven. But don’t take that from a blog post. Take it from MIT. They ran a field experiment — not a lab simulation, not some clever survey. A real-world test with 2,310 participants creating real ad content for a real think […]

Learn More April 2, 2025

A Billboard and Brush. Defiance and Hope

Given the last 70 days of assholery, cruelty, mendacity, and stupidity, we all deserve an uplifting start to the week. Thus the following story appearing on Substack by the author whose nom de plume is Your Weirdo Friend. There’s something about this story—simple, plainspoken—that cuts through all the  noise and bloviating hammering us daily. No […]

Learn More March 31, 2025

When Progress Isn’t Enough: The Risk of Public Goals in Fundraising

One of the greatest movies of all time for those of us who enjoy parody, slapstick and juvenile humor is Will Ferrell’s Talladega Nights. He spends most of his life against an impossible standard of “if you ain’t first you’re last”, a motto from his father who was high on peyote at the time he […]

Learn More March 28, 2025

Fundraising’s 3-Minute Track Problem

There’s a popular belief that modern songs are shorter because people—especially young people—have shorter attention spans. Makes sense, right? TikTok. Streaming. Clicks. Scrolls. No patience. Turns out… wrong. A recent data dive from Stat Significant analyzed 150 million song streams and listener behavior. What they found is more interesting—and far more relevant to fundraising than […]

Learn More March 26, 2025

Cracking the Code: How to Make Sure Donors See Themselves in Your Appeals

Most fundraising messages follow the same pattern: brand on one side, programs on the other, and hope in between. We call this bookend fundraising, heavily focused on who we are as an organization and what we do, while leaving the rest of the bookshelf, where the donor’s personal story should be, empty. The rub?  The […]

Learn More March 24, 2025

More Exposure, More Money…Until It Backfires Like a Bad Tinder Streak

A mysterious student at Oregon State University attended class for two months completely enveloped in a large, black bag. Only his bare feet were visible. Each Monday, Wednesday, and Friday at 11 a.m., the Black Bag sat on a small table at the back of a Speech 113 – Basic Persuasion class. The professor knew […]

Learn More March 19, 2025

Weaponized Giving

The prevailing wisdom in fundraising circles is giving is fueled by altruism, a desire to help. But recent research on retributive philanthropy—donating to punish a perceived wrongdoer—turns this assumption on its head. Donors are motivated not just by love but also by anger, moral outrage, and a thirst for justice. Retribution donations spike when donors […]

Learn More March 17, 2025

Building a Shit Sandwich for Trump

          The green shoots are rising. They push through the cracks, stubborn, reaching for light. You see it in the streets. In the faces at town halls. In the crowds swelling, growing, multiplying.            It started in places people don’t always look. Decatur, Georgia. Vancouver, Washington. Pittsburgh, […]

Learn More March 14, 2025

<< 1 … 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 … 180 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    DonorVoice products

    Commitment System

    Donor Feedback Platform™

    PreTest Tool

    TouchPoint Mapping



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!