• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Uncategorized

Highs, Lows, Buzzwords, Likes

In case you missed it over the holidays, the Chronicle of Philanthropy published some interesting fundraising highlights of 2012 … 5 Nonprofit High Points in 2012 — of these, I’d go with setting up Center for Disaster Philanthropy 5 Nonprofit Low Points in 2012 — each of these a real downer, but one represents a […]

Learn More January 4, 2013

How Big Is The Nonprofit World?

According to the Urban Institute’s Nonprofit Almanac 2012, this big (click image to enlarge) … And if you want a sense of its diversity, just go The Agitator website and watch the scroll (bottom left column) we maintain of our recent subscribers. Amazingly diverse. And hopefully all will advance their missions in meaningful ways in […]

Learn More December 31, 2012

Did You Make Them Feel Good?

Hopefully as 2012 ends, your year-end fundraising has gone gangbusters! One HUGE 3-day weekend left. If it hasn’t gone so well, ask yourself these questions … How well do you know your donor? Did you make them feel good? Sure, in retrospect, you might have tried this or that different tactic … maybe a 3x […]

Learn More December 28, 2012

Mayan Marketing

Fundraisers know all about disaster fundraising. Some relief groups have made it into a veritable art form. I’m not being at all critical. At such times, the need is profound and visible. Catastrophe helps shake many dormant donors out of their lethargy … and turns some into lifelong givers. That’s terrific. At the same time, […]

Learn More December 26, 2012

The Agitator Christmas Tradition Continues

  For some it’s the Yule Log. For others, mistletoe, For still others, mincemeat pie. For us, it’s Christmas carols. Here is The Agitator’s most enduring tradition. For our  12th Christmas, and into our 13th year, we urge you to get into a mirthful holiday spirit by enjoying to this unforgettable rendition of O Holy […]

Learn More December 21, 2012

Giving Tuesday … Or Was It Monday?

More often, Roger is the curmudgeon at The Agitator editors’ meetings, but I guess today the distinction falls to me. Roger called my attention to this notice that on the inaugural ‘#Giving Tuesday‘ (how did I miss this on my calendar?), online contributions (at least those processed by Blackbaud) were up 53% over the same […]

Learn More November 29, 2012

Persuade Or Convince?

In this ‘to the point’ post, marketer Seth Godin argues simply that: “Marketers don’t convince. Engineers convince. Marketers persuade.” As Godin observes, persuasion is about emotion and imagination. Convincing is about data and rationality. His conclusion: “If you’re spending a lot of your time trying to convince people, it’s no wonder it’s not working.” In […]

Learn More November 27, 2012

Online Surveys Vs Telephone Surveys

Using the 2012 presidential election as the backdrop for our post on predictive analytics, I highlighted the work of Nate Silver, the wunderkind statistician who runs the 538 Blog at the New York Times, and the fact that he was driving the seat-of-the-pants pundits nuts. Despite some incredulous political pundits, Nate correctly predicted the winner […]

Learn More November 15, 2012

Who Are The Nonvoters?

As we head into the US presidential choice, and candidates zero in on the final thousands of likely, but undecided, voters in America, the non-story is about those who are not likely to vote. This report from Pew Research looks at the nonvoters, who in 2008 were 43% of the voting age population. Here’s the […]

Learn More November 2, 2012

Useful Promises

Here’s a Seth Godinism about marketing that might apply to fundraising … I’ve made one word change to help you decide. Useful and believable promises “That’s another way to think about marketing. We only sign up/pay attention to/pay for offers from marketers when: What’s promised is something we think is worth more than it costs […]

Learn More October 11, 2012

<< 1 … 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 … 181 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    DonorVoice products

    Commitment System

    Donor Feedback Platform™

    PreTest Tool

    TouchPoint Mapping



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!