• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Uncategorized

Citizen vs. Congress Arms Race

Get Active brings to our attention the “technology arms race” between our Congressional representatives and us … their constituents. Congress seems intent upon thwarting legitimate grassroots lobbying campaigns. Here's a compelling POV from Bill Pease, Get Active's CTO.

Learn More July 13, 2006

Am I a Grump Head?

Like most of you, I'm thrilled to see Newsweek report that environmentalism is on the ascendancy in America. But I can't help recalling a comment made years ago by Jacques Cousteau to the effect that Americans' embrace of the easy task of recycling would actually undermine what was harder and really required, as he saw […]

Learn More July 12, 2006

Broken Models

Some business models “break” faster than others, but none is everlasting. What about your fundraising model? How is it holding up? This is a question non-profit marketers should think about no less than commercial marketers. For example, per the NY Times, AOL has indicated it will soon abandon the iconic pay subscription model that successfully […]

Learn More

If Banks Can Do It …

At least half of the 12 biggest banks in America are developing or have released live chat capabilities on their websites according to a piece in yesterday's iMedia Connection. Well, if big banks –not usually associated with terms like “cutting-edge” or “personal service” — can use live chats to give their customers help with loans […]

Learn More July 11, 2006

Possibly the Best Online Money You’ll Ever Spend

Slowly but surely the hype and hope that has surrounded online fundraising for most of the past decade is giving way to facts, analysis and the development of sound general principles. Nonetheless, there are many, many questions crying out for answers: How does online giving impact long-term donor value and the overall success of fundraising […]

Learn More July 10, 2006

Overreliance On Generosity of the Wealthy

The Business section of today's New York Times leads with a story headlined, “Fighting Diseases with Checkbooks: Rich Donors Can Be a Fickle but Essential Source of Aid for Medical Research.” Writer Andrew Pollack reports on the dangers of relying too heavily on the whimsy of the Big Donor but notes that these gifts for […]

Learn More July 9, 2006

How Would You Know?

The latest issue of Non-Profit Times reports reveals that the #1 factor for donors contributing long term to an organization — selected by 35% of respondents — is that “the organization is well managed and your money is well spent.” OK. Seems like a no-brainer? Our question is: How would your donor know? How well […]

Learn More July 8, 2006

Compelling Images … Or Spam?

On the basis of testing they have done, M+R Strategic Services reports that inclusion of images within online e-mail appeals for action or funds does NOT necessarily translate to better response. They point out that anti-spam features built into most e-mail systems increasingly tend to block images, unless users have have elected to change default […]

Learn More July 6, 2006

Educating Your Donors

Most non-profits would agree that they are in the education business. Indeed, members/donors often regard their organizations as their primary and most trustworthy information source on the issue, cause or purpose that pulled them in. But how seriously does your organization really take its education mission? And is your non-profit fully capturing the marketing opportunity […]

Learn More

Send the Babes?!

First, we implore you … don't shoot the messengers! Here's a study, first reported in a June 15 NYT column, that looked at door-to-door fundraising solicitation and concluded that the strongest incentive for generating the gift was to send a more attractive female to do the … asking! No joke. The University of Chicago prof, […]

Learn More July 5, 2006

<< 1 … 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q: As a designer who works with non-profits on fundraising strategy, I see the language like the following: “Our supporters help empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs.” I do not think the word “help” is useful–I think “Our supporters empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs. ” is much more engaging. Thoughts?

    Whether “help” is more engaging or not really depends on the framing and context. The word help can sometimes weaken the perceived agency of the supporter, making their role feel secondary rather than central (your point). On the other hand, help can also signal collaboration rather than implying full ownership of the outcome, which might […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: We started offering a donor cover option last april 1. The data to date suggests this may be dampening giving.eg. those who say yes to donor cover have a lower average gift (based on analysis of 6000+ gifts). I’m wondering if those who give lower gifts feel more guilt and therefore say yes to donor cover or if the presence of donor cover is making people adjust (lower) their gift size to accommodate the extra 3%. Would love any insights you have.

    Great question! Here’s how behavioral science can help unpack what might be happening: Pain of Paying: Even a small extra charge can make giving feel more transactional than emotional, potentially reducing generosity. Fairness Concerns: Some donors might perceive donor cover as a surcharge rather than a contribution to the cause. If they feel the charity […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: When writing an appeal, I waffle back and forth between writing “Your gift CAN…” or “Your gift WILL…” Any studies of which of these two words is best for an appeal?

    The choice between “Your gift CAN…” and “Your gift WILL…” taps into the psychological framing of certainty vs. possibility. Currently, there is no academic research directly comparing these two framings in charitable appeals. However, I suspect no framing is universally better—the outcome likely depends on your target audience and the campaign’s goal. Here are some thoughts: Certainty Framing – […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Do you have any insight on whether integrating an individual giving appeal with other comms from the charity in both appearance and messaging can uplift results? Or does the actual appeal become ‘lost’ for lack of stand-out?

    Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Is there any research on response rate impact in direct mail when referring to a sustainer gift as ongoing or recurring (catching all frequencies) v. monthly or annual?

    I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: A major conservation nonprofit sends me lots of mail, many of which have on the envelope “time to renew” or “2nd notice.” I find this practice deceptive, especially as I haven’t given to said organization since 1997. It must be effective or they wouldn’t do it. But is it ethical?

    Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]

    Read Full Answer

    DonorVoice products

    Commitment System

    Donor Feedback Platform™

    PreTest Tool

    TouchPoint Mapping



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2025, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!