• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Uncategorized

We Overshot

Obama barely gave us enough time to embarass ourselves with our fundraising predictions … he must have been reading The Agitator to time his fundraising announcement! He reported today that he raised $25 million in the 1st Quarter, from 100,000 donors. Of this, $6.9 million was raised online from “more than half” of those donors. […]

Learn More April 5, 2007

Obama $$ Prediction

“OK,” you're saying, “you guys have a cute blog, but do you really know anything about fundraising?!” So we'll put our reputations on the line … Tom predicts Obama will report $35 million in 1st QTR contributions. Roger says $29.5 million. Both figures exclude any transfers from his Senate campaign. Anyone care to join the […]

Learn More April 4, 2007

No Good Deed Goes Unpunished

Recently Todd Cohen of Philanthropy Journal took to task American Idol for perceived shortcomings in its planned awareness and fundraising initiative, “Idol Gives Back,” scheduled for April 24-25. Idol says it wants to focus the attention of its 26-28 million weekly viewers on the impact of extreme poverty on children and young people in Africa […]

Learn More March 29, 2007

Anonymity Sucks

Yes, anonymity sucks. Whether in the context of … Posting a “Big Sister” Hillary video. Writing an blog “evaluating” charities. Making a “Comment” on someone's website or blog. Sneaking a contribution to a political candidate. Faking “grassroots support” for a legislative goal. Hiding behind an e-mail nom de plume. Anonymity used to attack or manipulate […]

Learn More March 22, 2007

Online Marketing – Theory & Practice

Today we're offering two kinds of nourishment. For those who'd like to learn by reflection, in this case on the changing nature of the digital marketing environment — diminishing impact of traditional media, proliferation of consumer-generated media, new communications gadgets, enormous challenges to measuring media effectiveness, and other mega-trends — we point you to this […]

Learn More March 20, 2007

Red Nose Day

Mike Johnston of HJC New Media, friend and fundraiser for causes in Canada, reminds us that Friday the 16th is Red Nose Day, a glorious young tradition in the UK (and a few other enlightened countries). Red Nose Day is a day of nationwide consciousness raising for efforts to assist the disadvantaged in the UK […]

Learn More March 14, 2007

Nonprofits Using MySpace

With traffic on social networking site MySpace continuing to soar, many nonprofits are experimenting with creating their own “personalities” on the site. This is great, so long as … 1. You've “taken care of business” first. Don't divert resources to experimenting until you're pretty confident about your basics — e-mail messaging and solicitation with great […]

Learn More March 13, 2007

Optimistic Bob

Yesterday we applauded the RED campaign, the cause marketing initiative spearheaded by Bono and Bobby Schriver. It's been taking some knocks lately — undeservedly, we argued — for under-delivering and for distracting folks from actually giving (versus consuming). Optimistic Bob, one of our readers, entered a pointed comment to our post, to which we want […]

Learn More March 9, 2007

Green Light For RED

Bloggers and marketers are a-twitter over the question of whether Bono's RED campaign is some kind of hustle. And beneath this specific controversy lies a more fundamental charge that most cause marketing is suspect, because it leverages that evil-of-all-evils –consumption — and puts the good guys in bed with villainous corporations. A number of our […]

Learn More March 8, 2007

A Cause To Die For

The Agitator regularly scans the search engines to bring our readers the absolutely hottest trends and news in fundraising and nonprofit marketing. So we regularly filter out the important, but regular, stuff (notice we're not giving you links for these) … Family launches fundraising benefit for burgled blind man Cambridge University nears billion pound fundraising […]

Learn More February 18, 2007

<< 1 … 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 … 180 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    DonorVoice products

    Commitment System

    Donor Feedback Platform™

    PreTest Tool

    TouchPoint Mapping



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!