• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Uncategorized

Possibly the Best Online Money You’ll Ever Spend

Slowly but surely the hype and hope that has surrounded online fundraising for most of the past decade is giving way to facts, analysis and the development of sound general principles. Nonetheless, there are many, many questions crying out for answers: How does online giving impact long-term donor value and the overall success of fundraising […]

Learn More July 10, 2006

Overreliance On Generosity of the Wealthy

The Business section of today's New York Times leads with a story headlined, “Fighting Diseases with Checkbooks: Rich Donors Can Be a Fickle but Essential Source of Aid for Medical Research.” Writer Andrew Pollack reports on the dangers of relying too heavily on the whimsy of the Big Donor but notes that these gifts for […]

Learn More July 9, 2006

How Would You Know?

The latest issue of Non-Profit Times reports reveals that the #1 factor for donors contributing long term to an organization — selected by 35% of respondents — is that “the organization is well managed and your money is well spent.” OK. Seems like a no-brainer? Our question is: How would your donor know? How well […]

Learn More July 8, 2006

Compelling Images … Or Spam?

On the basis of testing they have done, M+R Strategic Services reports that inclusion of images within online e-mail appeals for action or funds does NOT necessarily translate to better response. They point out that anti-spam features built into most e-mail systems increasingly tend to block images, unless users have have elected to change default […]

Learn More July 6, 2006

Educating Your Donors

Most non-profits would agree that they are in the education business. Indeed, members/donors often regard their organizations as their primary and most trustworthy information source on the issue, cause or purpose that pulled them in. But how seriously does your organization really take its education mission? And is your non-profit fully capturing the marketing opportunity […]

Learn More

Send the Babes?!

First, we implore you … don't shoot the messengers! Here's a study, first reported in a June 15 NYT column, that looked at door-to-door fundraising solicitation and concluded that the strongest incentive for generating the gift was to send a more attractive female to do the … asking! No joke. The University of Chicago prof, […]

Learn More July 5, 2006

Wanted: More Fireworks!

As We The People celebrate America's 230th Independence Day amid fireworks, barbeques, volunteer fire department parades, the televised PBS special from the National Mall in Washington, D.C., and heaven only knows how many political speeches and kissed babies, it's probably wise to think about the word “independence” itself. Especially in our trade where there's damn […]

Learn More July 4, 2006

Wikipedia Alert!

The Chronicle of Philanthropy warns (available to Chron subscribers ony) that charities should monitor descriptions that might be published about them in Wikipedia, the community-authored online encyclopedia. The article notes several instances where inaccuracies or deliberate misinformation has been posted, sometimes by well-meaning, but not well-informed supporters; sometimes by critics. We agree … check, correct, […]

Learn More

Bated Breath and Hyperbole Aside, Here’s A Winner!

At a time when the Buffett gift is generating a lot of media attention about charities and their stewardship, it's worth revisiting this report from Public Agenda on donor attitudes toward charities. Good work despite its sometimes bated- breath tone and hyperbolic descriptions. The study, sponsored by the Kettering Foundation and Independent Sector takes the […]

Learn More July 2, 2006

Contrarian Approach to Legacy Marketing

At a time when most institutions' planned giving programs more resemble a tax seminar than anything noble and motivational the Legacy Giving Group has come up with a unique and measurable program. It will revolutionize the industry and no doubt send shivers through the establishment, let-keep-doing-it-the-old-way crowd. You can find a copy of the Legacy […]

Learn More July 1, 2006

<< 1 … 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    DonorVoice products

    Commitment System

    Donor Feedback Platform™

    PreTest Tool

    TouchPoint Mapping



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!