• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Uncategorized

Salience Over Saturation: Why Timing Outperforms Volume

If you’ve ever sat in a campaign planning meeting staring at last year’s results and this year’s bigger revenue target, you’ve heard what comes next. “Let’s add more touchpoints.” Sometimes it’s delivered with missionary zeal of someone who believes revenue rises in proportion to frequency.  Sometimes it comes from the exhausted fundraiser who knows better but […]

Learn More February 18, 2026

Honey.Bunny and the Case for Matching Message to Person

Imagine getting an email from honey.bunny77@hotmail.de. What would you immediately infer about this person? Ok, spam and X-rated content but after that you might infer age, maybe gender, maybe a certain playfulness or lack of seriousness. You formed a view about competence and credibility from a string of characters. That instinct is not random. Researchers […]

Learn More February 13, 2026

What Your Appeals Sound Like When You’re Not in the Room

Every fundraising appeal is written by someone, often many someones. It’s you, your agency, a committee, a boss, or a document that’s been revised so many times nobody remembers who it was originally for. A voice emerges out of that process and not one in the brand guide but instead, the one that survives review, […]

Learn More February 11, 2026

Every Movement Needs a Symbol

Last night, millions watched Bad Bunny deliver a Super Bowl halftime performance that was more than just entertainment. It was a defiant, vibrant display of Puerto Rican pride, punctuated by the flags and cultural symbols that spoke volumes without a single word. His powerful visual declaration reminded us of a fundamental truth: every movement needs […]

Learn More February 9, 2026

Is Your Quality Data 3,008 or So 2000 and Late?

The Black Eyed Peas may not dominate my playlists, but they were right about one thing. Some ideas age badly, and you tend not to notice until you’re already behind. Retention data is one of those ideas. Not because it is useless, but because it tells you what already happened, long after you had a […]

Learn More February 6, 2026

Can Direct Response Do Brand’s Job?

I was wrong about direct response and and brand. I told myself a comforting story, direct response acquisition spend is our brand spend. We’re reaching new people, telling stories, and putting our name in front of audiences who had never heard of us. Sure, we also asked for money but that didn’t negate the brand […]

Learn More February 2, 2026

Your Generational Mkt Deck: Horoscopes in Business Casual

I’m still alive and the world hasn’t ended, so it must be time for our semi-irregular tilt at the horsh$% windmills of generational marketing. The equine dung pile of evidence against is deep, here’s another gem. BBH Labs created a “Group Cohesion Score” to measure how alike different groups actually are, using UK survey data […]

Learn More January 30, 2026

Cost to Raise a Dollar Is a Terrible North Star

Nonprofits don’t drift into short-termism because fundraisers are shallow, boards are naïve, or donors are irrational. They drift because volume machine system scorecard makes short-termism feel responsible. Conversion rate, cost per acquisition, ROAS, and cost to raise a dollar define success as whatever is immediate and attributable. Inside that world, the only decisions that look […]

Learn More January 28, 2026

Why Not Asking Can Be the Highest-Value Decision

Fundraising calendars carry an assumption so familiar it rarely gets questioned. If we aren’t asking, we must be losing $. The logic feels airtight. Appeals go out, money comes back, reports show positive net and the activity feels justified. Asking seems to cause giving, so more asking should produce more revenue. That belief survives because […]

Learn More January 26, 2026

Is the Juice Worth the Squeeze? What Real Personalization Actually Buys You

Picture two donors who give to the same food bank.  One always has a plan, calendars are full, bills paid early. They give because keeping things stable matters, and because someone needs to make sure the system holds. The other is just as generous, but wired differently. She’s energized by new ideas, new approaches, and […]

Learn More January 23, 2026

<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 … 180 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    DonorVoice products

    Commitment System

    Donor Feedback Platform™

    PreTest Tool

    TouchPoint Mapping



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!