• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Donor acquisition

Discover Fresh Potential in the New Peer-to-Peer Landscape

Otis and Katrina have done it again!  I’m speaking of fundraisers/authors Katrina VanHuss and Otis Fulton. Their just-released  Social Fundraising: Mining the New Peer-to-Peer Landscape —  a must-read encore to Dollar Dash, their breakthrough guide to tapping the true potential of Peer-to-Peer fundraising. The potential of Peer-to-Peer fundraising (let’s call it P2P for brevity’s sake although […]

Learn More February 6, 2023

Adopters as Sustainers? Calling All Cat and Dog Lovers.

It can be a dog eat dog world in fundraising these days.  Costs going up, yields down. Everybody wants more sustainers but how? What if the best source in the animal welfare world is your adopter file? To find out more and hear about this significant source of sustainers and share in actual experiences join […]

Learn More February 3, 2023

Quality Comes From Quantity But…

Author Ray Bradbury said, “Quantity produces quality.  If you only write a few things, you’re doomed”. There’s at least three, fundraising nuanced takes on this. You’re running a quantity model business and have a set ratio of quantity to quality donors you bring in.   This model fails for almost every charity save for the uber […]

Learn More February 1, 2023

Sell Me This Pen

To borrow from Boiler Room, “a sale is made on every solicitation you send.  Either you sell the donor on why they should give or they sell themselves on why they shouldn’t.” The Hollywood, sales-genre movies are often fantastic and full of useful tidbits.  Sell Me This Pen, famous in sales folklore and cinema, is […]

Learn More January 30, 2023

Should Your Fundraising Match a Chatbot?

Who doesn’t love a good chatbot?  Version 1.0 of chatbot world was a lot like comparing Siri to Chat-GPT, it’s Artificial Stupid vs. Artificial Intelligence. But, modern day bots are increasingly more GPT-like, which means they’re more human like, more conversational, more adaptive and more helpful. Consider today’s off the shelf chatbot options allow you […]

Learn More January 25, 2023

Love or Hate AI as Writing Tool?

In 1959 a german computer scientist developed an automated text generator using Kafka’s novel, The Castle for source material.   Harold Cohen, a painter, used mechanical devices attached to a computer to create versions of his original art, which he sold in galleries.  This was 60 plus years ago. Using computers as writing or creative aids […]

Learn More January 23, 2023

Are You Defining Engagement Downward?

Aah Engagement, a euphemism if there ever was.  An English word that once had meaning, twisted and contorted to its lowest common denominator of likes, clicks and superficial, mostly meaningless outcomes. Too many groups jump to the end and cobble together non-financial behaviors (click, like, attend, follow) and call it an “Engagement Score”. Facebook calls […]

Learn More January 20, 2023

Does Your Job Security Match that of a Roman Emperor?

Being a Roman Emperor came with certain upside – power, money, luxury, debauchery (if into that sort of thing)… With that upside is a high likelihood of suffering a violent death.  Fundraising chieftains or those brought in to deliver a new world order won’t be publicly executed but their survival rate likely mirrors that of […]

Learn More January 13, 2023

My High Openness Got In the Way of Your Social Proof Nudge

One (tiny) facet of behavioral science is nudges or the tendencies of humans to be influenced by certain types of information or presentation. This is where Cialdini’s six principles of persuasion fit in. Authority: People are more likely to be swayed by those perceived as expert or authorities on a subject. Consensus (and it’s Social […]

Learn More January 11, 2023

Why Do Liberals Drink Lattes?

Are you a liberal?  Did you find yourself buying more from brands that took a political stand, especially during the Trump presidency? You’re not alone. Compensatory consumption theory says people buy as a way to compensate for psychological needs or deficits. In other words, if we feel like we’re lacking control or meaning in our […]

Learn More January 9, 2023

<< 1 … 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 … 168 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q: As a designer who works with non-profits on fundraising strategy, I see the language like the following: “Our supporters help empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs.” I do not think the word “help” is useful–I think “Our supporters empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs. ” is much more engaging. Thoughts?

    Whether “help” is more engaging or not really depends on the framing and context. The word help can sometimes weaken the perceived agency of the supporter, making their role feel secondary rather than central (your point). On the other hand, help can also signal collaboration rather than implying full ownership of the outcome, which might […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: We started offering a donor cover option last april 1. The data to date suggests this may be dampening giving.eg. those who say yes to donor cover have a lower average gift (based on analysis of 6000+ gifts). I’m wondering if those who give lower gifts feel more guilt and therefore say yes to donor cover or if the presence of donor cover is making people adjust (lower) their gift size to accommodate the extra 3%. Would love any insights you have.

    Great question! Here’s how behavioral science can help unpack what might be happening: Pain of Paying: Even a small extra charge can make giving feel more transactional than emotional, potentially reducing generosity. Fairness Concerns: Some donors might perceive donor cover as a surcharge rather than a contribution to the cause. If they feel the charity […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: When writing an appeal, I waffle back and forth between writing “Your gift CAN…” or “Your gift WILL…” Any studies of which of these two words is best for an appeal?

    The choice between “Your gift CAN…” and “Your gift WILL…” taps into the psychological framing of certainty vs. possibility. Currently, there is no academic research directly comparing these two framings in charitable appeals. However, I suspect no framing is universally better—the outcome likely depends on your target audience and the campaign’s goal. Here are some thoughts: Certainty Framing – […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Do you have any insight on whether integrating an individual giving appeal with other comms from the charity in both appearance and messaging can uplift results? Or does the actual appeal become ‘lost’ for lack of stand-out?

    Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Is there any research on response rate impact in direct mail when referring to a sustainer gift as ongoing or recurring (catching all frequencies) v. monthly or annual?

    I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: A major conservation nonprofit sends me lots of mail, many of which have on the envelope “time to renew” or “2nd notice.” I find this practice deceptive, especially as I haven’t given to said organization since 1997. It must be effective or they wouldn’t do it. But is it ethical?

    Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]

    Read Full Answer

    DonorVoice products

    Commitment System

    Donor Feedback Platform™

    PreTest Tool

    TouchPoint Mapping



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2025, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!