• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Uncategorized

Is Your Brand Name Like Throwing Up?

I promise this title isn’t clickbait while acknowledging it probably feels that way. The mouth’s first job before words and speech existed was to swallow food and liquid that was digestible and return indigestible items back to nature in reverse order.  These days, the mouth has a much bigger role to play notwithstanding the two-to-one […]

Learn More December 11, 2023

Is Your Brand Famous and Unique?

Half of brand ads are mistaken for competitor brands per LinkedIn research.   A thought exercise: Imagine removing your logo and brand name from your appeal.  Would any donor know it was from your organization?  Is there anything uniquely you after removing your mark and name?  How many other charities are likely to be mentally associated […]

Learn More December 8, 2023

What if KISS emphasizes the 2nd “S” Too Much?

“If only we could get more people to give and do so more regularly.” ” Let’s devise a test. ” The HiPPO (Highest Paid Person’s Opinion) in the room says, “More people will give if we change the landing page to have more/less…text/pictures/fields.” “Great, we’ll do that test”, says the non HiPPO in the room.  […]

Learn More December 6, 2023

Matching Gift Hot Mess

It’s as if slapping “matching” on an appeal is all the thought that’s required.  Many of these offers are contrived or copycat-like but this one takes the cake for confusion and the irony is not lost on it being from Behavioral Scientist, a publication purpose built to help readers learn how to lower mental barriers […]

Learn More December 4, 2023

Too Much of What Matters Doesn’t Get Measured At All

Does the donor experience (DE) matter to retention?  If so, we probably need to deconstruct the abstract DE term. Let’s start with context, this example is a telefundraising campaign converting digital petition leads to sustainer. A Mental exercise:  Name two parts of the call experience that have a statistically significant impact on sustainer attrition in […]

Learn More December 1, 2023

Mobile Giving and My Focus on Me

Do you think it’s a positive if people, experience a warm glow from giving foster a sense of empathy in deciding to give give to reinforce personal values and goals I’d say yes to all these and in so doing, say yes to self-focus, which has several facets: Self-Reflection: “I often spend time reflecting on […]

Learn More November 29, 2023

More Bees With Honey

Face-to -face fundraising is a tough business, full of rejection.  Although your direct mail appeal gets rejected at an even higher rate (unopened, non-response) it’s less personal, less in your face, literally. Fundraisers need to be resilient.   If you can’t handle rejection, you can’t handle the gig. As a relevant aside, DVCanvass (our F2F and […]

Learn More November 27, 2023

More Similar Than Different?

Willingness to play the long game, risk taking, and pro-social attitudes determine, respectively, how much people are willing to save for the future instead of spending now, if they’re ready to take risks for potential gains, and how they act with others. These Big Three preferences have a big influence on how markets and institutions […]

Learn More November 17, 2023

No Ragrets?

There’s a funny scene in “We’re the Millers” where Scottie P., a skate rat and carnival worker, arrives to pick up Casey, one of the main characters. Scottie P. is carefree and mostly oblivious, highlighted by his “No Ragrets” tattoo. Jason Sudeikis, playing Casey’s father, asks about it, “What’s this one?” pointing to the chest […]

Learn More November 15, 2023

Make Em’ Feel Sad or Hopeful?

There is a lot of misinformation out there about the role of emotion in fundraising.  The misinformation ain’t at presidential politics level but still, off the mark. There is research and lots of test results in a vacuum that’ll show negative emotions “work”.  The social science explanation is that a negative emotion like sadness invokes […]

Learn More November 10, 2023

<< 1 … 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 … 180 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    DonorVoice products

    Commitment System

    Donor Feedback Platform™

    PreTest Tool

    TouchPoint Mapping



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!