• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Uncategorized

Halfway, Now What? Tell Us.

We convened the esteemed (read: infamous) Agitator editors and all our dedicated senior staff and researchers (read: Google search, Google scholar search and Chat-GPT) to debate the merits of taking a few days off to celebrate the quintessential American holiday, July 4th. And in a bout of irony, we decreed it so despite the staff […]

Learn More July 3, 2023

GPT? Yes. Chat-GPT? No.

The number of people professing to be expert in AI or machine learning (and not knowing the difference) is skyrocketing.  It’s like the 19th century gold rush with con artists selling worthless mining technology. I’m going to share our experience with GPT for copy and make recommendations.  I didn’t stay in a Holiday Inn last […]

Learn More June 30, 2023

Are Your Typography Choices Random?

Typography encompasses a lot.  This is a simplified summary, Typeface Style (serif, sans serif, script) Size (10pt or 12pt) x-height  (the height of letter “x” in different fonts) Weight – light, normal, bold Slant – normal or italic Spacing Between Letters (known as kerning) Between Sentences (leading) Layout Headlines, subheads, copy blocks Length of line […]

Learn More June 28, 2023

Building A Bridge Or A Moat?

Your charity’s issue or area of focus needs oxygen, like a flame, to stay lit.  It requires exposure and active discourse to grow support and make material improvement against the problem. We’re all in the advocacy business.  But is your approach building a moat or a bridge? The organizations in the orange circles are moat builders, […]

Learn More June 23, 2023

Last Chance

What a fortnight it’s been.  Thank you Agitator readers for indulging over two weeks on one topic, Personality.  We think it matters that much to understanding human attention, interest and action. And yes, DonorVoice has crass, commercial interest and we’ll end on that note while hopefully not souring the taste of the other Personality morsels […]

Learn More June 21, 2023

Matching Story to a Person’s Layers

I want a story that speaks to me.  But who am I?  A bundle of complexity just like you and exactly not like you. Personality Psychologists often talk about three layers of a person, The foundational, rough sketch layer are our broad personality traits.  You’re extroverted, I’m introverted.  You’re agreeable, I’m not.   But there are […]

Learn More June 19, 2023

Impossible Today, Not Tomorrow

I recently heard the founder of Not Impossible Labs speak.  He’s got an impressive and moving story, worth checking out. The big takeaway for me?  Everything Possible today was Impossible at some point in the past. Therefore, Impossible is a fallacy or in need of a corollary, it’s only Impossible Today.  Moving from Impossible to […]

Learn More June 16, 2023

Be Innovative And Traditional?

The post title reminds me of the spoof video making fun of management consultancies with the edict by the client to make 3 lines that are simultaneously parallel and perpendicular and the obsequious senior consultants promising it. Being Innovative and Traditional in format, design and copy seems impossible. At least if we’re limiting ourselves to […]

Learn More June 14, 2023

Morning Person or Evening?

Your morning or evening preference is heavily dictated by your circadian rhythm.  This morning or evening-ness preference is also associated with your cognitive and emotional effectiveness. I’d love to time my marketing message to when people are more likely to be mentally plugged in, wouldn’t you? This is Personality week (1 of 2) and so […]

Learn More June 12, 2023

The Pseudoscience of Brand Personality

Have you ever been in a discussion about brand attributes or brand personality?  What about research studies measuring how much donors think the brand fits certain attributes? Did it feel wildly generic or maybe, contrived?  Does anybody think about a brand as being charming or good looking? One of the most well-respected marketing and brand […]

Learn More June 9, 2023

<< 1 … 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 … 181 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    DonorVoice products

    Commitment System

    Donor Feedback Platform™

    PreTest Tool

    TouchPoint Mapping



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!