• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Uncategorized

Collapsing Conscientiousness? Collapsing Headlines Is More Like It

The Financial Times recently told us that young people’s personalities are “in freefall.”  It’s the stuff generational bias dreams are made of.  Here are the Big Five in brief: Conscientiousness: Reliability, follow-through, discipline. High scorers pay bills on time and floss. Neuroticism: Proneness to anxiety and stress. High scorers catastrophize emails. Agreeableness: Cooperativeness and empathy. […]

Learn More August 20, 2025

Bringing Back the Best of the Good Old Days

Forty years ago, when our kids were small, we’d pile into the car and head to the local Chili’s in Northern Virginia. Back then, it felt like the friendliest place on earth. The fajitas sizzled, the chips came out warm, and the servers remembered your name—or at least acted like they did. The place smelled […]

Learn More August 18, 2025

Good Stories Beat Good Ideas

The nonprofit sector has almost no barrier to entry and an unforgiving math problem: more organizations every year, fewer donors giving. The easy wins are gone and the noise has increased exponentially. The solution isn’t necessarily a bigger audience, a new program, or a sharper operational plan. It’s the story. Humans don’t just like stories, […]

Learn More August 15, 2025

Grifter’s Guide to Digital Fundraising: Under Review, But Still in Circulation

We’ve been pounding this drum so long our sticks are down to splinters. Since 2018, The Agitator has documented the rise of scammy, self-dealing PACs, the flood of questionable Democratic  and Republican fundraising texts, and the digital consultants who treat donors like slot machines and loyalty like a rounding error. We’ve published exposés, followed the […]

Learn More August 13, 2025

Mistaking Obligation for Reciprocity

Imagine two donors. One downloaded crucial information from your website; maybe a treatment checklist for newly diagnosed cancer patients. The second received a branded tote bag in the mail. Both feel an urge to give. But an urge of different quality. The first feels genuine reciprocity: “They helped me. I want to give back” The […]

Learn More August 11, 2025

What Makes a Story Stick? The Psychology Behind Fundraising Narratives

We all want a story that speaks to us, one that fits the inner narrative we’re writing, editing, and living every day. But who is this “me” the story should speak to? That’s a surprisingly complex answer as I’m a bundle of contradictions—just like you, and exactly not like you. Personality psychologists often describe three […]

Learn More August 8, 2025

Connection Starts Where Most Segmentation Stops

If we want real connection, we have to stop pretending our generic segmentations are anything but shortcuts.  We slice people up by what’s available—age, income, gender, channel, how they transact, etc. But the minute we start grouping by these surface traits, we’ve injected bias. And not just demographic bias, behavioral bias. We’re assuming the thing […]

Learn More August 6, 2025

Is Your Appeal Too Much, Too Soon?

Researchers ran a simple experiment. Two versions of a fundraising campaign with same photo, same story, same goal. One used the phrase “malignant tumors” in the headline, the other, a softer “illnesses.” The result?  Naming the disease performed much worse.  But this testing was on a crowdfunding platform with donors seeing saw multiple campaigns side-by-side.  […]

Learn More August 4, 2025

Matching Gifts Are So Tired But Here’s a Twist

We’re not fans of matching gift offers.  They used to be strategic: tied to a big gift or a time-sensitive campaign. Now they’re everywhere, overused and generic and often the match isn’t a message, it’s the message. Make no mistake, you’re subsidizing the donation and sensitizing people to the discount, just like retailers coupons.  How so? […]

Learn More August 1, 2025

Ten Years of Hope, Hype, and Heartburn

I’ve  been poking around in the Agitator attic lately—blowing dust off ten years of posts, decks, podcasts, conference swag, industry reports and other artifacts of our beloved trade.  Call it fundraising death cleaning. Call it archaeology with spreadsheets. Either way, it’s a look at what mattered to fundraisers back in 2015, and what matters now […]

Learn More July 30, 2025

<< 1 … 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 … 180 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    DonorVoice products

    Commitment System

    Donor Feedback Platform™

    PreTest Tool

    TouchPoint Mapping



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!