Speed Kills

April 7, 2023      Kevin Schulman, Founder, DonorVoice and DVCanvass

Urban Dictionary says “Speed Kills” is an expression the British police made up to justify all the money made from speed cameras.  That origin story is patently false but also patently funny.

In our world speed matters.  I expect readers’ fast-twitch muscles kick in and interpret that to mean faster is better, which ain’t the case.  I’ll further amend to argue it’s the mismatching of speeds that causes issues. 

A case in point, the SVB collapse.  The last hours of this crisis were a function of speed mismatch among the relevant parties.  Customers didn’t need to physically go to a bank to withdraw all their money.  Initiating the transaction was in the palm of their hand, literally.  Same for the banks, their speed matched the customer and $42 billion was withdrawn in hours.

Gone are the day of 1946, Bedford Falls and George Bailey where folks needed to show up for a good ol’ fashioned bank run.  Except that the final actor in the SVB drama, the US-banking system and its government tethers, still operates on Bedford Falls speed – bank operating hours, market operating hours, daily cutoff times for Fed transfers, and wire test run requirements…

There was plenty of collateral money available to cover the 42 billion and then some, it was just too slow.  Speed mismatch.

A natural disaster strikes and donor awareness is nearly instantaneous.   A charity misdeed creates instant, negative press.  Decisions to give and not give, respectively, are made right away.

Turnaround time for a thank you, does it match the donor’s expectation speed?

How much turnaround time does your organization require to signoff on decisions big and small?  A simple, digital form change for an A/B test can take weeks, months even.

Sometimes the wheels of bureaucracy prevent rash decision making, acting on whims.  Often though, bureaucracy slows progress, which, in a vacuum is only a half-problem. Until you realize progress is happening without you, making it a full, big, hairy problem.  The lack of pacing, the lack of matching speed.

What about speed the other way, with the sector moving faster than the donor?  How about that 12th Giving Tuesday reminder email?  Or the 6th email in the matching gift series?  Or the mail that seemingly hits days apart in a perpetual onslaught?

Slower, more pacing, more down-time is a much better match to minimize irritation, maximize brand-building and dollars raised.

Speed matters but more accurately, matching of speeds.

Kevin

P.S. Don’t forget to register for our Creating Quality Donors From Scratch learning session 

4 responses to “Speed Kills”

  1. Shannon Nichols says:

    Thanks. I’m the philanthropy director of a mid size nonprofit and have been bumping up against this issue lately and trying to articulate ‘speed mismatch’ for the past few weeks. Thanks for naming it. Please keep writing about this topic.

    • Kevin says:

      Shannon, thanks for your feedback. What are some examples of speed mismatch you’ve been wrestling with?

  2. Tom Ahern says:

    Thank you, Kevin. My brain has never, ever gone in this direction before: “speed mismatch.” My specific takeaway from your post: “Turnaround time for a thank you, does it match the donor’s expectation speed?” And not just turnaround speed … QUALITY of the emotional contact counts, too.

    Maybe the most important “research” (wouldn’t pass peer-review muster I suppose … but still flamingly insightful) is John Lepp’s TikTok (and LinkedIn) analysis of his mother-in-law’s charity mail, the stuff that assaulted her mailbox over 12 months.

    Dale gives to a lot of charities. She received more than 500 items in a year. Only ONE item was a thank you … and it wasn’t all that great, but it did have some handwriting. It stood out enough that SHE told John, “I’m moving that charity into my top 3.”

    Fundraiser? Or “senior VP in charge of thanks”?

    • Kevin Schulman says:

      Tom, thanks for the comment. I saw that video and massive pile of mail. There is good research on how people sort and mentally process mail. Many of the strategies are defensive in nature but they also look for things that stand out and this isn’t just his mother-in-law, a lot of folks are doing this.