The Value of a Fundraiser

June 16, 2021      Roger Craver

Almost every sector of the economy is now facing the issue of how many employees will actually return vs. how many will simply opt for greener pastures.

If the financial meltdown of 2008 was the Great Recession, will almost-post-pandemic- 2021 turn out to be the Great Resignation.

Virtually every part of the nonprofit sector – from higher ed, to healthcare, to advocacy and social benefit  organizations –have historically been notoriously irresponsible when it comes to training, onboarding, promoting  and holding on to fundraisers.

The result of this neglect on the part of boards, CEOs and even the fundraising profession itself has resulted in a turnstile of turnover.

[ In 2014 an Education Advisory Board Study showed the average tenure of a major gift fundraiser was 18 to 24 months.  Five year later, in 2019 a Chronicle of Philanthropy /AFP Study revealed that the situation hadn’t improved; 51% of American and Canadian fundraisers were expected to leave their jobs within 18-24 months. And most disturbing? 30% of the respondents said they were planning to leave the fundraising trade altogether.]

There’s a variety of causes that drive fundraisers so quickly head to the exits.  Over the years The Agitator has explored many of these here, here and here.  In a survey of fundraisers conducted by The Agitator The reasons range from lack of support from the top to a woeful lack of appreciation.  24% of the respondents said their CEO “treats them like the gardener.”

If dairy farmers and growers managed cows and crops the way many nonprofit leaders deal with fundraisers there’d be an international shortage of butter, milk, oranges and apple juice.

A review of the literature on fundraiser retention indicates that the primary reason (given by between 47% and 51% of respondents to various studies) is money.

Although many fundraisers say they’re adequately or even generously paid, that doesn’t stop their eyes –and feet—from wandering off to greener pastures.

How Much is a Fundraiser Worth and How to Calculate that Value

Just how much is a fundraiser worth?   How do you quantify that value?  What does the anticipated  post-pandemic turnover of fundraisers –dubbed by some the “Great Resignation” – mean for our sector and for specific organizations?

To get the discussion going in your organization or among your colleagues I recommend this thoughtful post on the website of the venerable philanthropic consulting firm Grenzebach Glier & Associates..(GG+A) With 60+ years’ experience serving top institutions around the world these folks understand the value of talent and experience more than most.

I suspect that’s why GG+A are featuring   Calculating the cost of losing high-performing fundraisers on their blog as helpful guidance for ways to calculate the talent crisis facing most organizations.

Any fundraiser with more than a few years’ experience knows that turnover is a major problem in our trade.   Yet, precious few nonprofit leaders take the problem seriously or make moves to do much about it.  They should.  Because, even in the “normal” world  – whether you’re Amazon, MacDonald’s or Home Depot the Society for Human Resource Management calculates that the cost of losing an employee comes in at between 80% to 200% of his/her salary.

The cost for losing fundraisers –particularly those who deal with major and mid-level donor is higher.  And that why you’ll want to share this GG+A article with the front office and your buddies.

Written by Naveen Vinukonda, Sr. VP for Philanthropic Analytics at GG+A and David Lively, Sr. Associate VP for Alumni Relations and Development and Campaign Manager at Northwestern University the article explores way to calculate the value –and loss—of a fundraiser.  Particularly major gift fundraisers.

Using data from a study of 180 major gift officers over a nine-year period at one institution they delve into issues such as how length of tenure affects value and cone up with a formula you may find helpful –The Net Fundraiser Value.

This approach may not apply to every situation, but the article gives us all a great jumping off point to do some own analysis within our own organization.  As you dig into it, I think you—and your board and CEO—will better understand the both the direct calamity and the subtle dangers that spring from anything short of paying full attention to the needs,  development, and proper recognition and compensation of fundraisers.

As the Great Resignation gets underway, is your organization prepared?

Roger

 

P.S.  For those who want/need to dig into this subject I also suggest you check out Penelope Burk’s Donor Centered Leadership that unpacks reasons why fundraisers leave. 

And to illustrate that even simple steps like paying for continuing education at conferences see this Agitator post titled Major Gift Fundraising For Smaller Organizations.  The post reports on an Adrian Sargent/Rita Kottasz study by the Centre for Sustainable Philanthropy that shows “each additional form of training/education(as in conferences, and even webinars) is associated with an increase of $37,000 in income.”

3 responses to “The Value of a Fundraiser”

  1. Gayle L. Gifford, ACFRE says:

    A number of thoughts.
    Fundraisers jumping ship for better pay and promotions: This reinforces the findings in UnderDeveloped that the majority of public charities in the US, which are smaller organizations, have a very hard time competing with the big guys for talent.
    4 years to return more than your salary and compensation as a large gift fundraiser. And that is at one institution, (likely a university, no?) This is longer than other estimates I’ve heard of two to three years. It would be great to have data for small organizations. What does this mean for our smaller charities CEOs if we tell organizations that the best return for their dollar is in large gift fundraising (let’s exclude grants), but only if they can wait it out for 4 years? And only if they can hang onto those fundraisers – paying competitive salaries and benefits that aren’t producing a positive ROI for 4 years? This all sounds bleak. Or, there is a need to finally see CEOs, whom I would guess have much longer tenure, as the chief large gift fundraiser. Maybe that’s whose professional development our industry needs to be spending the most effort on.

  2. Fern Sanford says:

    All these studies focus on the major gifts officers, who are usually treated as royalty in Development departments, in comparison with the other staff. The Membership, Annual Giving, and Development Services staff are usually treated (and paid) far worse. The junior staff, which could be an organization’s farm team, are rarely acknowledged or nurtured by senior management. In fact, they are not seen as potential leaders, but people expected to last a few years and leave. At least that’s been my experience.

  3. Roger, Each year for the past dozen, I have randomly chosen to follow the use by the public of their “discretionary dollar”. That is what is given to nonprofits. So I searched for a for profit simple example that also relies on “discretionary dollars” and was about the size of Philanthropy in 2009, $350 million. Well, I had a chance to see the Giving USA Road Show the other day that now philanthropy is up to $477 billion with now estimated as much as $100 Billion hoarded in DAF, not having immediate if ever impact on our charitable society. My nonprofit choice was the Out Door Recreation Industry which in 2009 was about the same as philanthropy. Today, nonprofits have grown by $100 billion over 11 years. The ORI, during the same period has grown to over a Trillion dollars or nearly three times their previous sales. Why? they adjust their product to be family and female user friendly—even while 70% of nonprofits are run by women, the constant male preference to solicit continues. Secondly, we haven’t changed our product to illustrate the impact and change our gifts have on society, we give a bed for a night, not a future for tomorrow. Finally, we give away all the benefit of our product without the financing of impact, the DAF is strangling the productivity of the nonprofit world, as I have suggested it would over 20 years ago. How this relates to compensation, we pay productive economically successful sales people a small pittance of what they could make in the for profit world. I am done with these charity evaluators who have no basis for their standards, nonprofit who don’t realize 87% of all wealth goes through the hands of a woman, and finally a group of nonprofit and funders who would rather hoard money for tomorrow rather than confront our needs for today. Finally, the level of malfeasance by nonprofit is substantially higher than few realize.
    Good to be reading you again, Roger. We are going public in a few days for the Growing Philanthropy Award given to you a few years ago. Hope you can help get the word out.