• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Uncategorized

Fundraising Efficiency vs Productivity

Which should be more important to your fundraising … efficiency or productivity? If you said productivity … gold star! If you said efficiency (sometimes expressed as ROI) … go to the back of the class! Or, more productively, read this piece by Tom Hurley at DMW Direct. As Tom sees it, the holy grail of […]

Learn More April 3, 2013

10 Dumbest Words Used by (Fundraising) Consultants

Integrate – unless something is being physically combined, steer clear.   Buzzword bingo aficionado’s can rest assured this word will show up in your next meeting. Illuminate – this word is used to ironically suggest the consultant will provide what he is incapable of – clarity. Solution – because “product” seems so simple or trite. Leverage – perhaps the most […]

Learn More April 2, 2013

What Is The Watchdog Watching?

This week the Chronicle of Philanthropy reported that members of the Direct Marketing Association  are working on an official protest against the watchdog Charity Navigator. At issue is Charity Navigator’s decision to challenge a longstanding accounting practice to count some of the money nonprofits spend in the course of fundraising as ‘program costs’ rather than […]

Learn More March 15, 2013

Flat Earth Fundraising: The High Cost Of Mistreating Suppliers

Some nonprofit fundraisers squeeze so hard on price that it’s enough to make a Hong Kong jeweler cry. Others treat their suppliers and consultants like some hired hand, there to do their bidding no matter how stupid and short-sighted. Still others — the successful and innovative (surprise!) – have mastered the art of building lasting, […]

Learn More March 13, 2013

So What?

Good answers are impossible without good questions. And in the era of ‘big data’, integrated marketing, and CRM (by whatever name), knowing the right questions to ask is even tougher yet important to sort out, lest one become paralyzed by data. In her article in Fundraising Success — Are We Focused on the Wrong Metrics […]

Learn More March 11, 2013

How To Evaluate Your Nonprofit’s CEO

Earlier this week we reported on our survey of fundraisers’ appraisals of the fundraising prowess and commitment of their CEOs. Our fundraisers gave their CEOs pretty low grades! We asked whether some independent party like Charity Navigator or the Better Business Bureau should rate nonprofit CEOs and Boards — 35% said yes to that idea; […]

Learn More February 21, 2013

Acquisition: More On Counterintuitive Effects Of Premiums

Just to keep the pot boiling here’s a follow-up on my Premiums, Crack Cocaine and Nonprofit Suicide post that spawned some helpful comments. I was particularly interested in the comments of readers with experience in public broadcasting, where the use of back-end premiums or ‘thank you’ gifts continues — after 30 or more years — […]

Learn More February 20, 2013

Fundraisers Rate Their CEOs

Awhile back we reported on the now-infamous Underdeveloped: A National Study of Challenges Facing Nonprofit Fundraising. One aspect of the study that drew attention was the somewhat lukewarm assessment by nonprofit CEOs of their development directors — 33% were dissatisfied or lukewarm about the performance of their development directors … and 24% said their development […]

Learn More February 19, 2013

We Regret To Inform You …

INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM To:  Belford                                                   Sunday evening FR:  Craver RE:  Your Request for Day Off The Agitator’s Human Relations Advisory Board has given careful consideration to your request for a one-day leave on 18 February . I regret to inform you the request has been denied.  Although The Agitator has a large U.S. readership … and […]

Learn More February 18, 2013

What Is A Fundraiser?

Since I kicked off  the yeasty, comment-filled week with the Fundraising Firing Squad Forms A Circle post, I think it appropriate to end the week with Ken Burnett’s brilliant What Is A Fundraiser?  just to be sure your blood pressure is properly book-ended. If you’ve followed the ‘Comments’ section on The Agitator about the dustup […]

Learn More February 15, 2013

<< 1 … 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 … 180 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    DonorVoice products

    Commitment System

    Donor Feedback Platform™

    PreTest Tool

    TouchPoint Mapping



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!