• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Uncategorized

Mmm, Mmm Good

Never at a loss for interesting posts with some fascinating factoids our friends over at Don't Tell The Donor continue to follow and report on cause-related marketing efforts involving breast cancer. This time on Campbell Soup's switch from their classic red and white cans to a pink model in support of National Beast Cancer Awareness […]

Learn More October 7, 2006

Study On Emails To Congress Stirs Hornets’ Nest

A few days ago, the Washington Post's Jeffrey Birnbaum reported under this headline, Study Finds Missed Messages on Capitol Hill, that six of the top ten vendors for email campaigns targeted at Congress failed to deliver half or more of their e-messages. His report was based on a study done for Capitol Advantage, a leading […]

Learn More October 6, 2006

The Winning Cartoon Is …

Nick Allen of Donor Digital impartially (his firm wasn't involved) commends this online campaign from the Union of Concerned Scientists. Called Science Idol, the campaign gives activists the chance to vote on a winning editorial cartoon dealing with political interference in government-sponsored research and reporting. 18,000 citizens chose from a dozen finalists. And here's the […]

Learn More October 5, 2006

“A lot of people almost helped her…”

“…but almost giving is the same as not giving at all.” The image of an elderly woman sitting forlornly in an apartment helps the Ad Council's new campaign called “Generous Nation” make a compelling point: when it comes to giving, almost doesn't count. Another commercial in the series features a man trying to walk up […]

Learn More October 4, 2006

Good News for Relief Organizations, Bad News for Others

The just-released Target Analysis Group's Quarterly Index of National Fundraising Performance delivers good news to international relief organizations — and some not-so-good-news for other sectors. First the bad news. According to the Index donor counts show a 2.5% drop for the first two quarters of '06 compared to 2005. Retention rates fell by 3.3%. Reactivation […]

Learn More October 2, 2006

Migratory Birds

It's good to remember that long before the birth of the internet and its open and marvelous culture of sharing information we fundraisers, like some medieval guild, took seriously the responsibility of continually educating each other while raising up the next generation. Through conferences, newsletters, seminars and just simple telephone calls there's always been a […]

Learn More October 1, 2006

Political + Video Junkie = The People Choose

Thanks to Joshua Levy at Personal Democracy Forum for this introduction to The People Choose. Think of TPC as a YouTube dedicated strictly to political campaign videos and ads. The site is organized by state and race, and is formatted so that you can view videos and ads for competing candidates side-by-side. And, of course, […]

Learn More September 28, 2006

Green, Greed, Greenwashing … Or Good?

A robust debate is occurring within the enviro community regarding the green epiphany of Wal-Mart, the second-largest corporation (after ExxonMobil) in the world in terms of revenue. David Roberts at environmental hub Grist, wonderfully refers to Wal-Mart as “every green's favorite source of cognitive dissonance.” He has editorialized very thoughtfully on Wal-Mart's apparent conversion and […]

Learn More September 27, 2006

Struggle Over ACLU’s Soul Escalates to Call for Ouster of Leadership

Today's edition of The New York Times reports that a long-seething battle within the American Civil Liberties Union has finally erupted in a very public way. Veteran Times staffer, Stephanie Strom, who has reported on controversies involving ACLU leadership policies and decisions over the past two years, this morning covers the launch of a movement […]

Learn More September 26, 2006

Change From The Inside … Impossible?

As usual, Seth Godin, revolutionary that he is, offers a provocative insight when he argues that serious change to the status quo, in any institutional setting, needs to come from the outside. Provocative? Yes. True? I'm not convinced. Here in part is what he says: Inside most fields, we see pitched battles between a few […]

Learn More

<< 1 … 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 … 180 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    DonorVoice products

    Commitment System

    Donor Feedback Platform™

    PreTest Tool

    TouchPoint Mapping



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!