• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Uncategorized

Senate Candidates & the Internet

The Bivings Group, an Internet consulting firm, reports that 96% of 2006 Senate candidates have campaign websites, 23% have blogs, 15% have Spanish-language content, and 5% have podcasts. Read full report.

Learn More May 29, 2006

Online $$ is Tip of Iceberg

The true $$ potential of email-acquired names is only captured through integrated marketing campaigns, where online solicitation is complemented by direct mail and telemarketing. These “complementary” channels often return more dollars than the online channel used to identify and enlist prospective donor/activists in the first place. If you're not moving in this direction, you oughta […]

Learn More May 24, 2006

Mi Gente: The Power of Latinos

Thanks to PoliticsOnline.com I've just learned of a hot Latino website, Mi Gente. Definitely worth checking out if your organization is interested in reaching Latinos. Here's what PoliticsOnline says about the site: MiGente.com Harnesses Latino Power The largest U.S. Web site geared towards Latinos just got better. This week, Community Connect upgraded its social networking […]

Learn More May 22, 2006

Amnesty Scores with Online Acquisition

Some interesting online acquisition data from Amnesty International, as reported by Nick Allen of Donor Digital. His example confirms what we've seen elsewhere … significantly higher average gifts from online donors can more than offset higher acquisition costs. And notice the admirable extent of testing in this campaign. If you want to dig deeper into […]

Learn More May 10, 2006

Online Advice for Non-profits

Latest e-newsletter from Non-Profit Advisors discusses six ways the Internet is most impacting non-profits. Some of this won't be news to the most I-experienced of you. Still, some useful food for thought.

Learn More May 9, 2006

Great Global Warming Ad

TV PSA from Environmental Defense. Pretty effective, I think. Yes/No?

Learn More May 7, 2006

“Fundraising” or “Marketing”?

Should we be talking about “fundraising” or “marketing?” Roger's a fundraiser — a master organizational strategist, he's no head-in-the-weeds guy. Still, he wants to know what your organization is doing today that might inspire the most contributions now from your current donors and their most likely clones. I'm a marketer — I want to know […]

Learn More

The Blogosphere Multiplies

Technorati counts 1.2 million new posts to blogs each day! I’ll bet the same non-profits that whine most about “aging files” will be the last to explore what blogging and other forms of social networking might mean to their future viability. Here’s the most comprehensive look at blogging data I’ve seen. For interesting companion analysis […]

Learn More

Are You a Believer?

Want the latest in commercial online marketing & promotion tactics & campaigns? Here's where I look. But then I'm a believer in the notion that commercial marketing has lessons for non-profit marketing. Are you?

Learn More

Pew Internet Project on Internet Penetration

Here's the latest (April 2006) from Pew Internet Project on internet penetration. Fully 73% of American adults are internet users; 42% of Americans have broadband access. That's 84 million folks.

Learn More

<< 1 … 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    DonorVoice products

    Commitment System

    Donor Feedback Platform™

    PreTest Tool

    TouchPoint Mapping



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!