• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Uncategorized

Punishing Women While Taking Their Money

            Among the host of current events ranging from terrifying to troubling there are two I want to focus on:  the 100thanniversary of the introduction Equal Rights Amendment on December 13th and the fleeing of  Kate Cox, the Texas mother denied permission for a life-saving abortion from her Texas home […]

Learn More December 15, 2023

Cul De Sac Fundraising

The echo chamber is getting louder, we tune out damn near everything not matching what we already believe and we’re much more likely to distrust people who aren’t like us. Partisan agreement between spouses was around 60% in the mid 60’s, it’s now closer to 85%.  Pew research shows partisans have few friends from the […]

Learn More December 13, 2023

Is Your Brand Name Like Throwing Up?

I promise this title isn’t clickbait while acknowledging it probably feels that way. The mouth’s first job before words and speech existed was to swallow food and liquid that was digestible and return indigestible items back to nature in reverse order.  These days, the mouth has a much bigger role to play notwithstanding the two-to-one […]

Learn More December 11, 2023

Is Your Brand Famous and Unique?

Half of brand ads are mistaken for competitor brands per LinkedIn research.   A thought exercise: Imagine removing your logo and brand name from your appeal.  Would any donor know it was from your organization?  Is there anything uniquely you after removing your mark and name?  How many other charities are likely to be mentally associated […]

Learn More December 8, 2023

What if KISS emphasizes the 2nd “S” Too Much?

“If only we could get more people to give and do so more regularly.” ” Let’s devise a test. ” The HiPPO (Highest Paid Person’s Opinion) in the room says, “More people will give if we change the landing page to have more/less…text/pictures/fields.” “Great, we’ll do that test”, says the non HiPPO in the room.  […]

Learn More December 6, 2023

Matching Gift Hot Mess

It’s as if slapping “matching” on an appeal is all the thought that’s required.  Many of these offers are contrived or copycat-like but this one takes the cake for confusion and the irony is not lost on it being from Behavioral Scientist, a publication purpose built to help readers learn how to lower mental barriers […]

Learn More December 4, 2023

Too Much of What Matters Doesn’t Get Measured At All

Does the donor experience (DE) matter to retention?  If so, we probably need to deconstruct the abstract DE term. Let’s start with context, this example is a telefundraising campaign converting digital petition leads to sustainer. A Mental exercise:  Name two parts of the call experience that have a statistically significant impact on sustainer attrition in […]

Learn More December 1, 2023

Mobile Giving and My Focus on Me

Do you think it’s a positive if people, experience a warm glow from giving foster a sense of empathy in deciding to give give to reinforce personal values and goals I’d say yes to all these and in so doing, say yes to self-focus, which has several facets: Self-Reflection: “I often spend time reflecting on […]

Learn More November 29, 2023

More Bees With Honey

Face-to -face fundraising is a tough business, full of rejection.  Although your direct mail appeal gets rejected at an even higher rate (unopened, non-response) it’s less personal, less in your face, literally. Fundraisers need to be resilient.   If you can’t handle rejection, you can’t handle the gig. As a relevant aside, DVCanvass (our F2F and […]

Learn More November 27, 2023

More Similar Than Different?

Willingness to play the long game, risk taking, and pro-social attitudes determine, respectively, how much people are willing to save for the future instead of spending now, if they’re ready to take risks for potential gains, and how they act with others. These Big Three preferences have a big influence on how markets and institutions […]

Learn More November 17, 2023

<< 1 … 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 … 168 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q: As a designer who works with non-profits on fundraising strategy, I see the language like the following: “Our supporters help empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs.” I do not think the word “help” is useful–I think “Our supporters empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs. ” is much more engaging. Thoughts?

    Whether “help” is more engaging or not really depends on the framing and context. The word help can sometimes weaken the perceived agency of the supporter, making their role feel secondary rather than central (your point). On the other hand, help can also signal collaboration rather than implying full ownership of the outcome, which might […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: We started offering a donor cover option last april 1. The data to date suggests this may be dampening giving.eg. those who say yes to donor cover have a lower average gift (based on analysis of 6000+ gifts). I’m wondering if those who give lower gifts feel more guilt and therefore say yes to donor cover or if the presence of donor cover is making people adjust (lower) their gift size to accommodate the extra 3%. Would love any insights you have.

    Great question! Here’s how behavioral science can help unpack what might be happening: Pain of Paying: Even a small extra charge can make giving feel more transactional than emotional, potentially reducing generosity. Fairness Concerns: Some donors might perceive donor cover as a surcharge rather than a contribution to the cause. If they feel the charity […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: When writing an appeal, I waffle back and forth between writing “Your gift CAN…” or “Your gift WILL…” Any studies of which of these two words is best for an appeal?

    The choice between “Your gift CAN…” and “Your gift WILL…” taps into the psychological framing of certainty vs. possibility. Currently, there is no academic research directly comparing these two framings in charitable appeals. However, I suspect no framing is universally better—the outcome likely depends on your target audience and the campaign’s goal. Here are some thoughts: Certainty Framing – […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Do you have any insight on whether integrating an individual giving appeal with other comms from the charity in both appearance and messaging can uplift results? Or does the actual appeal become ‘lost’ for lack of stand-out?

    Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Is there any research on response rate impact in direct mail when referring to a sustainer gift as ongoing or recurring (catching all frequencies) v. monthly or annual?

    I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: A major conservation nonprofit sends me lots of mail, many of which have on the envelope “time to renew” or “2nd notice.” I find this practice deceptive, especially as I haven’t given to said organization since 1997. It must be effective or they wouldn’t do it. But is it ethical?

    Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]

    Read Full Answer

    DonorVoice products

    Commitment System

    Donor Feedback Platform™

    PreTest Tool

    TouchPoint Mapping



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2025, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!