• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Uncategorized

No Ragrets?

There’s a funny scene in “We’re the Millers” where Scottie P., a skate rat and carnival worker, arrives to pick up Casey, one of the main characters. Scottie P. is carefree and mostly oblivious, highlighted by his “No Ragrets” tattoo. Jason Sudeikis, playing Casey’s father, asks about it, “What’s this one?” pointing to the chest […]

Learn More November 15, 2023

Make Em’ Feel Sad or Hopeful?

There is a lot of misinformation out there about the role of emotion in fundraising.  The misinformation ain’t at presidential politics level but still, off the mark. There is research and lots of test results in a vacuum that’ll show negative emotions “work”.  The social science explanation is that a negative emotion like sadness invokes […]

Learn More November 10, 2023

Your Awareness Problem and What to Do About It

All but the largest charity brands are mostly unknown by most people.  We all fish in the same pond for the same donors over and over.  And most fundraising professionals believe a dollar not spent on conversion is a dollar wasted. But how to break out of the doom loop of rising costs, lower performance […]

Learn More November 8, 2023

Do You Have a GoodHart?

Columbia University recently skyrocketed from #18 to #2 on the US News college rankings.  They spent lots of time and energy understanding the ranking metrics and methodology and then, they, well…lied. One of its own math professors confirmed as much.  Columbia claimed 96.5% full time faculty, real number more like 74%.  A 6:1 student to […]

Learn More November 6, 2023

Livng Dusday

Over the last two years we’ve collected 573 Giving Tuesday emails.  Here’s a lexical analysis that categorizes email subject lines and assigns Autonomy, Competence and Relatedness scores.  Why do those scores matter?  These are our core, psychological needs. If my brief interaction with your brand leaves me feeling need satisfied then you’ve created an internal […]

Learn More November 1, 2023

How Do Donors (Not) Open The Mail?

Like everyone, I’ve got a habitual, auto-pilot process for managing the physical mail. And since I, like many a reader, am on a million and one seed lists and donate to charities I receive a #$@% ton of charity mail. Plus, my family has what seems a daily supply of last-mile delivery from online, consumer […]

Learn More October 30, 2023

It Takes A (Personality) Village

The goal of diversity is better ___________.   There are lots of ways to fill in that blank; one option is business success. And there are lots of ways to define diversity, one of which is how we see the world, our innate traits.  This first bar chart shows companies broken out by number of […]

Learn More October 27, 2023

The Donor’s Experience Matters But Not Equally

Word of mouth is an interesting phenomenon because it’s inherently organic and somewhat unpredictable and impossible to turn off.  If you have an online presence you’ll get word of mouth whether you want it or not.  And even if you could erase your online presence, there’ll forever be ‘offline’ WOM. And while charities aren’t purpose […]

Learn More October 25, 2023

Is Your Direct Mail Funnel All Bookends?

We send out X pieces, Y people respond.  Done and dusted.  This isn’t a funnel, it’s two bookends and no books. You’re missing out on the stories, lessons, and nuances contained within the “books” in the middle – the donor behavior, preference and needs in these crucial steps. Here’s a much more complete mental model […]

Learn More October 20, 2023

What Happens When All the Paper Checks Are Gone?

There was a day when the last phone call was made by rotary dial.  Similarly, the last buggy manufactured, and the last VCR tape inserted. And someday is a day in the horizon when the last paper check will be written.  But we needn’t wait for that day as it’s already dawning and as European […]

Learn More October 18, 2023

<< 1 … 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 … 168 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q: As a designer who works with non-profits on fundraising strategy, I see the language like the following: “Our supporters help empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs.” I do not think the word “help” is useful–I think “Our supporters empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs. ” is much more engaging. Thoughts?

    Whether “help” is more engaging or not really depends on the framing and context. The word help can sometimes weaken the perceived agency of the supporter, making their role feel secondary rather than central (your point). On the other hand, help can also signal collaboration rather than implying full ownership of the outcome, which might […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: We started offering a donor cover option last april 1. The data to date suggests this may be dampening giving.eg. those who say yes to donor cover have a lower average gift (based on analysis of 6000+ gifts). I’m wondering if those who give lower gifts feel more guilt and therefore say yes to donor cover or if the presence of donor cover is making people adjust (lower) their gift size to accommodate the extra 3%. Would love any insights you have.

    Great question! Here’s how behavioral science can help unpack what might be happening: Pain of Paying: Even a small extra charge can make giving feel more transactional than emotional, potentially reducing generosity. Fairness Concerns: Some donors might perceive donor cover as a surcharge rather than a contribution to the cause. If they feel the charity […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: When writing an appeal, I waffle back and forth between writing “Your gift CAN…” or “Your gift WILL…” Any studies of which of these two words is best for an appeal?

    The choice between “Your gift CAN…” and “Your gift WILL…” taps into the psychological framing of certainty vs. possibility. Currently, there is no academic research directly comparing these two framings in charitable appeals. However, I suspect no framing is universally better—the outcome likely depends on your target audience and the campaign’s goal. Here are some thoughts: Certainty Framing – […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Do you have any insight on whether integrating an individual giving appeal with other comms from the charity in both appearance and messaging can uplift results? Or does the actual appeal become ‘lost’ for lack of stand-out?

    Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Is there any research on response rate impact in direct mail when referring to a sustainer gift as ongoing or recurring (catching all frequencies) v. monthly or annual?

    I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: A major conservation nonprofit sends me lots of mail, many of which have on the envelope “time to renew” or “2nd notice.” I find this practice deceptive, especially as I haven’t given to said organization since 1997. It must be effective or they wouldn’t do it. But is it ethical?

    Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]

    Read Full Answer

    DonorVoice products

    Commitment System

    Donor Feedback Platform™

    PreTest Tool

    TouchPoint Mapping



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2025, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!