• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Uncategorized

Beware of Junk Science

The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator is the most popular personality test in the world.  Fortune 100 love it.  Government agencies love it.  More than 1.5 million people take it every year. Our only issue with it as social scientists is this:  It’s garbage.  Otherwise, the behavioral scientists at DonorVoice love it. It fails two fundamental requirements. […]

Learn More September 9, 2024

What’s cul-de-sac fundraising look like?

The echo chamber is getting louder, we tune out damn near everything not matching what we already believe and we’re much more likely to distrust people who aren’t like us. Partisan agreement between spouses was 60% in the mid 60’s, it’s now closer to 85%.  Pew research shows partisans have few friends from the opposing […]

Learn More September 6, 2024

No Heavy Lifting

We’re taking the day off in deference to our U.S. readers coping with the official end of summer after a long Labor Day weekend. Enjoy … and welcome back to the grind! Kevin and Roger

Learn More September 2, 2024

Why Starting with Groups Misses the Mark: The Case for Bottom-Up Segmentation

Those in the East are more communal and interdependent while those in the West assign greater value to individualism.  People in North America tend to place more value on being unique and are more inclined to focus on their own positive qualities than East Asians. These are very common beliefs, often promoted by cultural psychologists […]

Learn More August 30, 2024

Do Neighbors Always Get the Same Direct Mail?

Bob and Bill are neighbors in Anytown, USA.  They’re the same age, race, income and married with 2 kids and a dog. They both give to the same NationalCharity.org and the same localcharity.org and with an identical RFM profile. Do they get the same direct mail piece?  100% of the time.  Why? Are demographics destiny?  […]

Learn More August 28, 2024

I Feel the Need, the Need for Speed

A line that corny has to be good. Plus, for this writer and many a reader, it was a coming of age movie.  But alas, now it’s back to our original, behavioral science fundraising channel. Here are three story attributes for success. Volume is bad. Does your story go from sad to happy but stop […]

Learn More August 26, 2024

Quick, Scan That Dude’s Head

The Oklahoma State college football team is slapping QR codes on the back of player helmets.  That could be an Onion article or meme fodder and yet it’s proof, life is stranger than fiction. The head coach is eccentric and eclectic and likely more than a bit frustrated by the new world order in college […]

Learn More August 23, 2024

Hello? Is there anybody in there? Just nod if you can hear me…

Conversation abounds in fundraising whether in-person or over the phone and everybody notes we should be active listeners and strive to make our conversations, well, conversational. That feels thin.  Social science has a better answer with implications for humans talking to humans but of equal import for AI bots that are rapidly evolving in ways […]

Learn More August 21, 2024

Is the Ask for a What or Who?

There are two mental giving decisions, will I give? (yes/no) and conditional on a yes, how much? Nobody makes the first decision because they’ve got an affinity for blankets over solar lamps.   We give to reinforce who we are and it’s easier to see me in another person or story then an inanimate object. But […]

Learn More August 16, 2024

Do You Fundraise At or With?

Does your fundraising ask who should I send this appeal to or what appeal should I send to this person? Fundraising at vs. fundraising with.  It’s the difference between involving and connecting versus hoping that people give you the mental time to see themselves in your appeal.  Most won’t. We also call it bookend fundraising, […]

Learn More August 14, 2024

<< 1 … 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 … 180 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    DonorVoice products

    Commitment System

    Donor Feedback Platform™

    PreTest Tool

    TouchPoint Mapping



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!