• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Behavioral Science Posts

Mind The Gap

Intended behavior vs. actual behavior.  That they don’t match up perfectly seems to invite the misleading adage that ‘people don’t do what they say’. In fact, the intention to do something is a great predictor of actually doing it. This means the primary focal point should be on what influences my intention, secondarily, the gap.  […]

Learn More April 28, 2023

The Moral Calculus to Giving

The giving decision often hinges on a moral judgement – is giving to help this person, place or thing the morally right thing to do? But two people can be a firm “yes” for different reasons since we don’t all use the same morality lens. There are five morality lenses onto the world. Care/harm: Sensitivity […]

Learn More April 26, 2023

Pronouns Matter

I or we.  You or us.  He or she.  Tiny words lumped into a category with articles and prepositions called functional words.  They’re the opposite of ‘content’ words, the meaty stuff of nouns, verbs, adjectives. How can these tiny words matter? For starters, they’re social words.  They help maintain conversation flow by indicated who or […]

Learn More April 21, 2023

Have You Been Selected?

Sometime last weekend, I think it was about 7:35 pm Saturday evening, as I worked my way through the week’s river of despairing news  and its ever-flowing tributary of emails telling me why my immediate help –even $3 –would make the difference,  my spirits suddenly lifted. Right there on that forlorn evening appeared an email […]

Learn More April 19, 2023

Do Donors Care About Your Solution or the Problem?

Would you be more willing to help the spotted owl if a solution offered to save 10% of the habitat or 50%?   Randomized experiments show it doesn’t matter. Odd, right? What about swapping out the spotted owl for reptiles?  Support goes down.  But, swap in turtles for lizards and support goes back up. Your $.50 […]

Learn More April 17, 2023

Is Your Quality Data 3,008 or So 2000 and Late?

The Black-Eyed Peas may not be in my most played list but hey, a catchy, memorable lyric is a catchy, memorable lyric.  Retention data is the rearview mirror view on quality, it’s 2000 and late. It’s a lagging indicator of quality.  You don’t need more donors, you need more donors who stick around.  But if […]

Learn More April 14, 2023

Do You Share Elon Musk’s Personality?

How you speak says volumes about who your disposition, your personality.  In fact, the ‘origin’ story for the Big Five (OCEAN) started with the supposition that our individual differences are reflected in the words we use. So, it stands to reason that I can decipher your personality by analyzing the words you use in conversation. […]

Learn More April 12, 2023

“Because It Works, That’s Why.”

Perhaps it’s time to rethink the ‘because it works’ claim so often trotted out in defense of dubious, deceptive fundraising tactics; enter the political email season. Between April 1st and 19th of 2019 the presidential candidates (at the time) sent a combined 1,730 messages, more than 19 a day, to supporters.  In defense or explanation […]

Learn More April 10, 2023

Speed Kills

Urban Dictionary says “Speed Kills” is an expression the British police made up to justify all the money made from speed cameras.  That origin story is patently false but also patently funny. In our world speed matters.  I expect readers’ fast-twitch muscles kick in and interpret that to mean faster is better, which ain’t the […]

Learn More April 7, 2023

Creating Quality Donors From Scratch

Are you tired of playing “Donor Roulette” with your acquisition efforts? Growing weary of playing the numbers game and crossing your fingers for donor gold? What if we told you there’s a better way to know your donors from the get-go? A way to ensure you’re not just acquiring any donor but cultivating the right […]

Learn More April 5, 2023

<< 1 … 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 … 168 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q: As a designer who works with non-profits on fundraising strategy, I see the language like the following: “Our supporters help empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs.” I do not think the word “help” is useful–I think “Our supporters empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs. ” is much more engaging. Thoughts?

    Whether “help” is more engaging or not really depends on the framing and context. The word help can sometimes weaken the perceived agency of the supporter, making their role feel secondary rather than central (your point). On the other hand, help can also signal collaboration rather than implying full ownership of the outcome, which might […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: We started offering a donor cover option last april 1. The data to date suggests this may be dampening giving.eg. those who say yes to donor cover have a lower average gift (based on analysis of 6000+ gifts). I’m wondering if those who give lower gifts feel more guilt and therefore say yes to donor cover or if the presence of donor cover is making people adjust (lower) their gift size to accommodate the extra 3%. Would love any insights you have.

    Great question! Here’s how behavioral science can help unpack what might be happening: Pain of Paying: Even a small extra charge can make giving feel more transactional than emotional, potentially reducing generosity. Fairness Concerns: Some donors might perceive donor cover as a surcharge rather than a contribution to the cause. If they feel the charity […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: When writing an appeal, I waffle back and forth between writing “Your gift CAN…” or “Your gift WILL…” Any studies of which of these two words is best for an appeal?

    The choice between “Your gift CAN…” and “Your gift WILL…” taps into the psychological framing of certainty vs. possibility. Currently, there is no academic research directly comparing these two framings in charitable appeals. However, I suspect no framing is universally better—the outcome likely depends on your target audience and the campaign’s goal. Here are some thoughts: Certainty Framing – […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Do you have any insight on whether integrating an individual giving appeal with other comms from the charity in both appearance and messaging can uplift results? Or does the actual appeal become ‘lost’ for lack of stand-out?

    Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Is there any research on response rate impact in direct mail when referring to a sustainer gift as ongoing or recurring (catching all frequencies) v. monthly or annual?

    I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: A major conservation nonprofit sends me lots of mail, many of which have on the envelope “time to renew” or “2nd notice.” I find this practice deceptive, especially as I haven’t given to said organization since 1997. It must be effective or they wouldn’t do it. But is it ethical?

    Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]

    Read Full Answer

    DonorVoice products

    Commitment System

    Donor Feedback Platform™

    PreTest Tool

    TouchPoint Mapping



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2025, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!