• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Uncategorized

The Double-Edged Sword of Social Proof in Fundraising

Social proof is a psychological and social phenomenon whereby individuals tend to emulate actions and behaviors of others to shape their own. It’s grounded in the belief that if many people engage in a certain behavior, it must be beneficial or correct, thereby prompting others to follow suit. Here’s an example fundraising message, “On average, […]

Learn More May 17, 2023

Is Your Fundraising Like Old Wine in New Bottles?

The jangle fallacy occurs when two similar or identical things are assumed to be different because they are labeled differently – old wine in new bottles.  This is rife in psychology where the term originated.  My fan faves, Grit.  In high school my kids were required to read the Duckworth book.  Grit was a new […]

Learn More May 15, 2023

Show Don’t Tell Emotions

If I had a nickel for every time I started a blog post with this line I’d have exactly $1.15.   Twenty-three times. An inflation adjusted synonym might be “If I had a dollar…” Speaking of synonyms, said the worst and longest windup, cry and weep are synonyms.  They are also action verbs. And these action […]

Learn More May 12, 2023

Don’t Dull Your Fundraising Sensory Symphony

There was a time when food purchasing was multisensory.   The food buying experience of a bygone era involved, Taste: Local markets or small shops offered samples galore.  Sampling is far less common, relying instead on packaging and branding. Smell: Food shopping used to be an aromatic experience, with the smells of fresh produce, baked goods, […]

Learn More May 10, 2023

Your Dual Message Pillars Should Be Bookends

If you take nothing else from this post, take this:  an awful lot is known about your donors. Too often we think we know very little. Consequently, we believe tailoring messages to who they are is seemingly impossible.   Sadly, this means everyone gets the same thing. Taxonomy is the science of naming, describing and […]

Learn More May 8, 2023

Death to Channels. Long Live Channels

Defining donors by channel is a bit like defining me by whether Amazon, USPS, UPS or Fed-Ex delivers my packages.  It’s accurate and objective but I rarely make that choice and it’s inconsequential to why I bought what I bought. The channel I give in is often a function of exposure and where I happened […]

Learn More May 5, 2023

Should You Turn Supporter Care Over to AI?

No is the short answer.  The longer one, you should be using AI to significantly boost productivity and increase the number of successful outcomes. It’s worth noting supporter care is more than donor care.  There are plenty of charities (e.g., health, education) whose donors also make use of the program/services side of the house. This […]

Learn More May 1, 2023

Mind The Gap

Intended behavior vs. actual behavior.  That they don’t match up perfectly seems to invite the misleading adage that ‘people don’t do what they say’. In fact, the intention to do something is a great predictor of actually doing it. This means the primary focal point should be on what influences my intention, secondarily, the gap.  […]

Learn More April 28, 2023

The Moral Calculus to Giving

The giving decision often hinges on a moral judgement – is giving to help this person, place or thing the morally right thing to do? But two people can be a firm “yes” for different reasons since we don’t all use the same morality lens. There are five morality lenses onto the world. Care/harm: Sensitivity […]

Learn More April 26, 2023

Pronouns Matter

I or we.  You or us.  He or she.  Tiny words lumped into a category with articles and prepositions called functional words.  They’re the opposite of ‘content’ words, the meaty stuff of nouns, verbs, adjectives. How can these tiny words matter? For starters, they’re social words.  They help maintain conversation flow by indicated who or […]

Learn More April 21, 2023

<< 1 … 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 … 168 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q: As a designer who works with non-profits on fundraising strategy, I see the language like the following: “Our supporters help empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs.” I do not think the word “help” is useful–I think “Our supporters empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs. ” is much more engaging. Thoughts?

    Whether “help” is more engaging or not really depends on the framing and context. The word help can sometimes weaken the perceived agency of the supporter, making their role feel secondary rather than central (your point). On the other hand, help can also signal collaboration rather than implying full ownership of the outcome, which might […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: We started offering a donor cover option last april 1. The data to date suggests this may be dampening giving.eg. those who say yes to donor cover have a lower average gift (based on analysis of 6000+ gifts). I’m wondering if those who give lower gifts feel more guilt and therefore say yes to donor cover or if the presence of donor cover is making people adjust (lower) their gift size to accommodate the extra 3%. Would love any insights you have.

    Great question! Here’s how behavioral science can help unpack what might be happening: Pain of Paying: Even a small extra charge can make giving feel more transactional than emotional, potentially reducing generosity. Fairness Concerns: Some donors might perceive donor cover as a surcharge rather than a contribution to the cause. If they feel the charity […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: When writing an appeal, I waffle back and forth between writing “Your gift CAN…” or “Your gift WILL…” Any studies of which of these two words is best for an appeal?

    The choice between “Your gift CAN…” and “Your gift WILL…” taps into the psychological framing of certainty vs. possibility. Currently, there is no academic research directly comparing these two framings in charitable appeals. However, I suspect no framing is universally better—the outcome likely depends on your target audience and the campaign’s goal. Here are some thoughts: Certainty Framing – […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Do you have any insight on whether integrating an individual giving appeal with other comms from the charity in both appearance and messaging can uplift results? Or does the actual appeal become ‘lost’ for lack of stand-out?

    Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Is there any research on response rate impact in direct mail when referring to a sustainer gift as ongoing or recurring (catching all frequencies) v. monthly or annual?

    I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: A major conservation nonprofit sends me lots of mail, many of which have on the envelope “time to renew” or “2nd notice.” I find this practice deceptive, especially as I haven’t given to said organization since 1997. It must be effective or they wouldn’t do it. But is it ethical?

    Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]

    Read Full Answer

    DonorVoice products

    Commitment System

    Donor Feedback Platform™

    PreTest Tool

    TouchPoint Mapping



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2025, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!