• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Uncategorized

Are You Growing…Or Just Getting Busier?

Nonprofits love metrics. They collect them the way some folks where I grew up collected souvenir spoons: polished, displayed, and mostly useless in any practical sense. They count: email volume impressions clicks campaign sends open rates ROAS conversion rate “engagement” (a word that means everything and therefore nothing) And if you’re really modern, you’ve got […]

Learn More January 21, 2026

Movements Aren’t Sold, They’re Joined

“Almost always, the creative dedicated minority has made the world better.” — Martin Luther King Jr. MLK didn’t “increase conversion” by pushing harder, he did it by standing for something so clear, human and morally framed that people wanted in. If your fundraising strategy is built on touchpoints, tactics (premiums, matching gifts), frequency and sprinkles […]

Learn More January 19, 2026

Conservatives from Mercury, Liberals from Pluto?

There is a common assumption in politics and fundraising that conservatives and liberals live in different moral worlds, different values, instincts, languages. It isn’t Venus vs. Mars, it’s more astrologocial miles, Mercury vs. Pluto maybe. The implication is if you want to reach one, you should not sound like the other. That assumption drives a […]

Learn More January 16, 2026

The Two Fundraising Debates That Keep Missing the Point

Fundraising loves a false tradeoff, actually, it loves two of them. The first is the endless argument about tone – positive versus negative appeals, hope versus fear, dignity versus distress. Every side has examples, benchmarks, and strong opinions, and every side can point to moments when the other clearly failed. The second is the equally […]

Learn More January 14, 2026

Are We Optimizing Tactics Based on Bad Beliefs?

A prior is your starting belief before new evidence shows up and not in some mystical sense but in a practical, operational one. “Ask more, make more.” “Recency is the strongest predictor of giving.” “Brand spend is less valuable than fundraising spend.” These aren’t law, they’re assumptions that once worked well enough to stop being […]

Learn More January 12, 2026

Five Days. Five Years. Same Checks.

Five days after the mob stormed the Capitol on January 6th in 2021—while the broken glass was still being swept up and the flags were still being folded—we posted Funding the Insurrection. Our question then was blunt and unavoidable:  Would corporate America keep funding the politicians who tried to overturn a presidential election? Back then, […]

Learn More January 9, 2026

Fundraising Has an Emotion Problem. It’s Not the One You Think.

Fundraising’s relationship with emotion is confused in a very specific way. Everyone agrees emotion matters, but the sector keeps treating emotion as if it were the mechanism rather than the medium. Feel something and people will act, lead with the heart and the money will follow. That framing has produced a lot of copy that […]

Learn More January 7, 2026

Stop Saying “Deliverability.” Start Worrying About “See-Ability”.

For years, our sector acted like email was a clear hallway: hit “send,” it lands, it gets opened, it earns its keep.  But today it’s really  fog. Nonprofits still talk about deliverability like it’s 2009: “Did it send?” “Did it bounce?” “Did it technically arrive?” But deliverability isn’t the problem. See-ability is: Did a real […]

Learn More January 5, 2026

New Year’s Week Editorial Note

This week’s post is brought to you by an AI-generated image and a calendar technicality. Dec 29 is Kevin’s birthday, which is an extremely convenient excuse for not publishing again. Yes, this is the same Kevin who, as a child, routinely got jobbed with “two-fer” Christmas and birthday – one gift, one card, two obligations […]

Learn More December 29, 2025

Christmas Week Editorial Note

This week’s post is brought to you by an AI-generated image, because even pretending to be thoughtful felt like too much effort. If you’re disappointed, you should get in line with our children and spouses… Please know we briefly considered a “Best Of” roundup, then remembered we have access to the reader stats and watch […]

Learn More December 22, 2025

<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 … 180 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    DonorVoice products

    Commitment System

    Donor Feedback Platform™

    PreTest Tool

    TouchPoint Mapping



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!