• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Uncategorized

The Median Charity Theory

The US Election outcome suggests the Median Voter Theory is alive and well.  It argues the candidate closest to the conceptual, median voter wins.  Why? Voters choose the candidate closest to them and in a 2 candidate race the rational, vote maximizing position for the candidate to stake out is the middle.   This theory purposefully […]

Learn More November 11, 2022

Does Your Giving Cup Spilleth Over?

If my first giving experience was good, will I be more or less likely to give the 2nd time?  This needn’t be rhetorical as obvious as the answer may seem.  We routinely measure satisfaction with the giving experience and see a strong, causal link in the direction you’d expect – good is good, bad is […]

Learn More November 9, 2022

Giving Research a Bad Name

I’m on record saying most research is garbage in, garbage out.  I’ve produced some of it over the years, giving me seasoned perspective.  And, at the time, I thought it was the greatest thing since sliced bread. The reason most research sucks is threefold, Poorly designed survey.  Survey design is a science. No analysis beyond […]

Learn More November 4, 2022

The Path to Hell is Paved With…Adverbs

So wrote Stephen King in his book, On Writing, further exclaiming he’d shout it from the rooftops. Adverbs aren’t officially a part of our Copy Optimizer Readability or Story Scores but they are a weak part of speech, leading to lifeless, dull writing.    The show don’t tell adage is  as known as it is ignored.  […]

Learn More November 2, 2022

Is Your Charity More Like Edgar Allen Poe or Jules Verne?

Edgar Allan Poe arguably invented the modern detective story and was a key creator of the Symbolism movement in poetry, plus  he wrote one of the first science fiction novels in 1838. He died young and penniless. Jules Verne invented nothing though gets credit in some quarters for inventing the sci-fi genre with his 1863 […]

Learn More October 31, 2022

Simple Writing Pays Off (Literally)

I stole this headline from a Harvard Business Review article.  The literal in this case is, well, literal. [Sidebar:  Are we all going to stand idly by while “literal”, literally becomes synonymous with figurative?  My British friends blame Americans and vice versa.  I say a pox on both  our houses, it’s happening, let’s put out […]

Learn More October 28, 2022

People With Less Free Time Volunteer More?

I’ve always heard the cash or time trope.  Hell, I’ve said it. People give of time or treasure depending on which resource they have more of.  Makes perfect sense except there’s little evidence beyond the anecdotal to support it. A German research study examines the impact of income and life’s other competing interests on discretionary […]

Learn More October 26, 2022

Who Owns the Story?

That’s the rhetorical question underlying an Amref Health UK report, a charity focused on health in Africa.  The report shares loads of useful detail on a direct mail test pitting what they call participant stories against charity stories. The report is authored by outside consultants, Jess Crombie and David Girling, in partnership with Amref.  The test […]

Learn More October 24, 2022

Should I Sustain or Should I Go Now? Stop Pressure Tactics.

Join in Please consider joining us for the Should I sustain or should I go now learning session. If you think donor experience matters to sustainer retention then the vague term needs to be broken down into specifics and we need to get more precise. Here’s an example, a telefundraising campaign to convert digital leads […]

Learn More October 21, 2022

Should I Sustain or Should I Go Now? Improving Journey.

Join us for Should I sustain or should I go now Last time we saw how to improve the quality of our sign-ups. So, now we have nothing but quality supporters walking through the door, they’ll all stick around, right? If only it were that easy with every part of your retention challenge living on […]

Learn More October 19, 2022

<< 1 … 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 … 180 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    DonorVoice products

    Commitment System

    Donor Feedback Platform™

    PreTest Tool

    TouchPoint Mapping



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!