• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Uncategorized

The Doom Loop Is a Media Problem, Not a Donor Motivator

If it bleeds, it leads, a cliche if there ever were. The usual interpretation is media force-feeding us a steady diet of misery and we reluctantly choke it down. But the more honest question is the uncomfortable one: are they shoving negativity at us, or are they simply serving what we reliably choose? A Russian […]

Learn More November 24, 2025

What Happens When AI Trains on the Good Stuff?

  Readers think they can spot real writing, trusting their ear for voice, rhythm, style. They assume they know what human feels like on the page. So when a group of researchers pitted expertly trained fine arts writers against AI, the expectation was obvious, humans would win easily.  And they did…in the first phase. When […]

Learn More November 21, 2025

The Unicorn We Need To Retire

I’ve been meaning to tell you something for a long time, and it’s time I finally say it out loud. It’s time to retire Renewal-as-We-Know-It—and the two donor behaviors that should replace the way most folks do renewals. It’s a confession of sorts—one part memory, one part reckoning, and a larger part responsibility. You see, […]

Learn More November 19, 2025

DONOR PRIVACY ALERT: AN OLD BATTLE, A NEW FLASHPOINT, AND A TASK YOU CAN’T PUT OFF

There are moments in this work when we don’t have the luxury of putting a thing aside, even for an afternoon. This is one of those moments. If you skim this post quickly, fine — but don’t delay acting on it. Not this time. Not with what’s at stake. An important federal case — Buckeye […]

Learn More November 17, 2025

Save One or Save Many? Depends on How You Ask

It’s rarely as simple as do X to get Y. “X” in fundraising is almost always a bundle of things, the donor’s Identity and Personality, the moral framing of the issue, the context, etc.  Every element interacts so do X, get Y is akin to a 3rd grade math applied to a calculus problem. A […]

Learn More November 14, 2025

Why Brand Still Isn’t What You Think It Is

I’d wager most people in direct response think of their acquisition as brand building. There’s a certain logic to it, sure but it’s mostly wrong for two reasons. 1) The algorithm. Direct response is bought to minimize cost per acquisition. That’s true whether you’re buying through Meta, Google, or a data co-op. The algorithm hunts […]

Learn More November 12, 2025

From Michelangelo to Match Offers: A Short History of Decline and How to Fix It

Over the last twenty years, marketing effectiveness has fallen sharply. Campaigns, ads, and fundraising appeals are moving fewer people to act, even as budgets and frequency continue to rise. The pattern is unmistakable. It’s not just that everything looks and sounds the same; it’s that much of what’s being repeated is simply bad. Almost nine […]

Learn More November 7, 2025

Ask Less, Commit More

One.  That’s the modal number of gifts per year from your one-off donors.  File averages hover around 1.6. If you get a donor to give twice, you’re a hero. The prevailing method for earning that cape has been volume, early and often. Consider a close encounters moment.  If an alien were told to get humans to […]

Learn More November 5, 2025

The Fundraising Story Is A Mirror, Not An Exhibit

The sector says it wants authentic stories and to avoid “poverty porn.” Both goals sound virtuous but neither has much meaning until you define what authenticity looks like or why some stories cross the line from empathy to voyeurism. Much stortelling best practice the equivalent of hosting a moral zoo. The beneficiary becomes the exhibit, […]

Learn More November 3, 2025

Who You Send It To vs. Who It’s For

Who do I send this appeal to? vs. What do I send to this person? Both sound similar are are about communication, segmentation, planning.  But they represent entirely different ways of thinking. The first question treats the donor as a distribution problem, a targeting exercise. The process is logical, efficient, and deeply familiar. The second […]

Learn More October 31, 2025

<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 … 180 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    DonorVoice products

    Commitment System

    Donor Feedback Platform™

    PreTest Tool

    TouchPoint Mapping



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!