• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Uncategorized

Teaching a Monkey to Wear a Tie Doesn’t Make it a Banker

Margaret Thatcher once said, “Being powerful is like being a lady. If you have to tell people you are, you aren’t.” The same holds for being trustworthy or authentic. If you have to claim it, you’re not it.  And if your organization is holding meetings about how to “sound more authentic,” you’re trying to put […]

Learn More October 6, 2025

The Roaring Membership Era

We all know the Roaring Twenties. But the Roaring late 1800s?  Ccheck out the table of membership groups and how many cracked 1% of the U.S. pop as members and the real roar happened 120+ years ago. I don’t know if this list is exhaustive or how “membership” was defined, but it’s a fascinating snapshot […]

Learn More October 3, 2025

Paychecks, Purpose, and the Real Math of Job Satisfaction

Money isn’t everything. In fact, sometimes it makes things worse. In one experiment, low-income people were given $2,000, $500, or nothing at all. Those who received cash were objectively better off — they paid bills, bought food, covered school costs. But subjectively? They reported higher stress and anxiety than the control group who got nothing. […]

Learn More October 1, 2025

How Best to Start an Appeal?

Before spreadsheets and sermons, there was the campfire. Across hunter-gatherer societies, storytelling coordinated cooperation, taught norms, and even conferred fitness advantages on skilled storytellers. Camps with more and better storytellers were measurably more cooperative; people preferred to live with them, and storytellers enjoyed higher status and benefits. Story wasn’t decoration, it was currency. A story […]

Learn More September 29, 2025

From Warm Glow to Durable Giving: Identity > Norms

When someone’s identity lines up with your mission, you’re not talking to a segment, you’re talking to a person who’s steeped in the thing. They’ve read, done,  experienced, observed.  They’re high interest and long-tenured with real-world expertise. What does that mean for messaging? Superficial won’t cut it. These people are looking for more. Match the […]

Learn More September 26, 2025

You Can’t Change the World From Under Your Desk

Let’s say you’re Bob Iger, CEO of the Walt Disney Company and owner of the ABC television network. You’ve helmed one of the most powerful media companies in the world. You’ve gone toe-to-toe with Trump on the Muslim ban, walked away from his President’s Advisory Council over Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris Climate Accords, and […]

Learn More September 24, 2025

The Fundraiser’s Phone Ban

We love tidy levers. Teens are anxious, so ban phones. Revenue is flat, so send more appeals. If the dashboard blips, we pat ourselves on the back. If it doesn’t, we reach for the same lever again. Reality is not that simple. Take the SMART Schools study in The Lancet. Thirty English secondary schools, 1,227 […]

Learn More September 22, 2025

Free Speech Without Courage Is…

Jimmy Kimmel didn’t get frogmarched off stage. No riot cops kicked in the studio lights. He wasn’t arrested, sued, or sanctioned. That would’ve been too obvious. Instead, they just took away the audience. Nexstar, a media monopoly in heat for a $6.2 billion merger, decided Jimmy Kimmel Live! wouldn’t air “for the foreseeable future.” Why? […]

Learn More September 19, 2025

Year-End Appeals Are Never Routine When The Republic Is At Stake

I’ve been digging through advocacy copy I wrote in the early 1970s, when the country was in upheaval. Not exactly like today, but a frighteningly similar era of turmoil, media spectacle, and debates about victimhood and radicalization. Back then, we witnessed a series of violent confrontations between government forces and protesters, prisoners, and activists. The […]

Learn More September 17, 2025

Your Appeal Calendar vs. Human Time

On a spreadsheet, every house-file mailing that clears “revenue > cost” looks like a win. Under scrutiny, a lot of that “win” evaporates. In two large field experiments, simply telling donors to expect another campaign later reduced current giving.  The control condition raised about 60% more than letters that primed for future asks, and the […]

Learn More September 15, 2025

<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 … 180 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    DonorVoice products

    Commitment System

    Donor Feedback Platform™

    PreTest Tool

    TouchPoint Mapping



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!