• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Uncategorized

Snake Oil, Plain Tofu, and the Broken Compass of Fundraising

It never fails. Every few years some bright-eyed consultant with a PowerPoint addiction announces they’ve cracked the code on donors. Not by, say, asking donors what they care about. Not by measuring what they actually do. No, no—by asking if they’ve ever used a rotary phone, or sent a postcard, or listened to music on […]

Learn More September 12, 2025

Gen Z to Save the Day

“There is a revolution under way . . . It is now spreading with amazing rapidity, and already our laws, institutions, and social structure are changing in consequence. Its ultimate creation could be a higher reason, a more human community, and a new and liberated individual. This is the revolution of the new generation.” This was written 51 […]

Learn More September 10, 2025

Responsive Multiples: The Donors You Can’t Treat Like Clones

After a first gift, most donors fall into two camps. The majority never give again. The next most common group gives exactly once a year, the Mode of 1. But there’s a third group. Smaller, more valuable, and more complex. They’re the donors open to giving more than once a year and we call them […]

Learn More September 8, 2025

Meet Your Most Common Donor

If you had to bet in Vegas on what happens after someone makes their first gift to your organization, what odds would you give? Most likely outcome? They never give again. About 60% likelihood.  This is donor turning into a non-donor. Next most likely outcome? They give once a year, not twice, not three times, […]

Learn More September 5, 2025

The Mirage of Ask More = Get More

Fundraising has long run on a seductive idea: if you ask, people give.  The logic feels airtight. Send an appeal and some money comes in. Send another and more money arrives. When your job is to hit a revenue target, those numbers on the Excel sheet feel like proof the model works. But it’s a mirage. […]

Learn More September 3, 2025

No Heavy Lifting

In deference to our U.S. readers, who are coping with the official end of summer after a long Labor Day weekend, your dutiful Agitator editors are following suit and taking the day off. Roger and Kevin

Learn More September 1, 2025

When AI Interviews Outperform Humans and What That Means for Fundraising

A large-scale randomized trial in the Philippines compared job applicants interviewed by a disclosed AI voice agent versus a human recruiter. The outcome wasn’t close: 12% more job offers 18% more job starts 17% higher 30-day retention No drop in applicant satisfaction And self-reported discrimination was cut by half under the AI interviewer. The AI’s […]

Learn More August 29, 2025

The Emotional Architecture of Giving

Show need, make it urgent, and never resolve it because if you show hope, you’ve given them a reason not to give.  Nonsense. Research looked at nearly 10,000 campaigns across two crowdfunding platforms.  The most successful appeals didn’t trap people in despair, they started negative and ended hopeful. On GoFundMe, campaigns that abide by this […]

Learn More August 27, 2025

Why Your Fundraising Test Probably “Won” by Luck & What to Do About It

It’s possible — maybe even likely — that your “winner” in a point-in-time fundraising A/B test didn’t win because of your headline, photo, or copy change. It probably won because of random noise. Before you yell at your screen that I’m an idiot (maybe true, but not for this reason), walk with me through the […]

Learn More August 25, 2025

Monthly Giving: The Lifeline We Keep Ignoring

I’ve been cleaning house. Not the dust and clutter kind, but the harder kind—going through old photos, boxes of files, the decades stacked like cordwood. “Death cleaning”, the Swedes call it. You sit with what you’ve carried, sort through the weight of your working life, and decide what still matters. In the midst of this, […]

Learn More August 22, 2025

<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 … 180 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    DonorVoice products

    Commitment System

    Donor Feedback Platform™

    PreTest Tool

    TouchPoint Mapping



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!