• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Uncategorized

Which Big Mac Ad Do You Prefer?

Old school Big Mac marketers would sell a Big Mac… By hiring an agency to come up with a clever, “emotional” ad.  Like this one. This ad would be shown to the McDonald’s rewards customers in email and on social. It would be aimed at anyone on mobile doing a search for “fast food near […]

Learn More September 18, 2023

Is Your Writing Edited?

Nancy Gibbs, former editor in chief of Time magazine, often quipped, “every word has to earn its place in a sentence, every sentence has to earn its place in a paragraph, and every idea has to earn its place in a text.” And it turns out we’re not very good at deleting when we edit.  One study […]

Learn More September 15, 2023

Is Your Charity Playing Soccer or Basketball?

In The Numbers Game the authors analyzed soccer teams and determined it’s a weak-link sport, the path to success comes not from investing more in top players but shoring up your weakest ones.  Basketball is the opposite, a strong-link sport, you need a superstar or two to have any chance. Science is or should be a […]

Learn More September 13, 2023

No Heavy Lifting

We’re taking the day off in deference to our U.S. readers coping with the official end of summer after a long Labor Day weekend. Enjoy … and welcome back to the grind! Kevin and Roger

Learn More September 4, 2023

Japanese Taxes, Premiums and Unintended Consequences

The Japanese can take free welding lessons near Mt. Fuji or test drive a Porsche or serve as mayor for a day.  The catch?  Give these locales some of your tax dollars. Japan has cooked a system letting taxpayers redirect some of their local taxes to towns or cities where they don’t live—and receive a […]

Learn More September 1, 2023

The U-Shaped Giving Curve

Much academic ink has been spilt dancing on the head of a pin while debating the U-shaped giving curve. What U-shape you ask?  The one showing rich, and poor give a greater percentage of their income than the middle class.  This phenomenon is real and until now, practically uninteresting since the explanation hinges on external […]

Learn More August 30, 2023

Rx for Fundraisers

If ever most of us could use some uplifting tonic following the Mug Shot Weekend, it’s now.  In fact, I’d argue we really need a double dose. Thus, today’s help-us-heal and lift up our sight’s elixir. It’s been 15 years ago this month since the indomitable Harvey McKinnon and his co-author Azim Jamal released their […]

Learn More August 28, 2023

The Enshittification of Digital Donor Acquisition 

It’s no secret, it’s increasingly difficult and expensive finding new donors online. Remember the Facebook ads glory days in the 2010s? It seemed all we had to do was upload a list of performing donors, spawn some lookalike audiences, toss in some photos with the right aspect ratios, slap a good caption on it, then […]

Learn More August 25, 2023

Six Golden Writing Rules

Eric Arthur Blair, better known by his pen name George Orwell, wrote, “Politics and the English Language” in 1946.  He hated empty and obscure prose.  His culprits were, Dying metaphors: essentially clichés, which “have lost all evocative power and are merely used because they save people the trouble of inventing phrases for themselves.” We won’t […]

Learn More August 23, 2023

Fitts Law and Your Donor’s Mouse (or Finger)

Paul Fitts, a psychologist from the 50’s realized many errors attributed to human fallacy were, in fact, due to poor design. His studies led to Fitts’s Law, which states that the time it takes to move to a target (like a donation button) depends on the target’s size and its distance from the starting point. […]

Learn More August 21, 2023

<< 1 … 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 … 168 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q: As a designer who works with non-profits on fundraising strategy, I see the language like the following: “Our supporters help empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs.” I do not think the word “help” is useful–I think “Our supporters empower every girl, ensuring she has the resources she needs. ” is much more engaging. Thoughts?

    Whether “help” is more engaging or not really depends on the framing and context. The word help can sometimes weaken the perceived agency of the supporter, making their role feel secondary rather than central (your point). On the other hand, help can also signal collaboration rather than implying full ownership of the outcome, which might […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: We started offering a donor cover option last april 1. The data to date suggests this may be dampening giving.eg. those who say yes to donor cover have a lower average gift (based on analysis of 6000+ gifts). I’m wondering if those who give lower gifts feel more guilt and therefore say yes to donor cover or if the presence of donor cover is making people adjust (lower) their gift size to accommodate the extra 3%. Would love any insights you have.

    Great question! Here’s how behavioral science can help unpack what might be happening: Pain of Paying: Even a small extra charge can make giving feel more transactional than emotional, potentially reducing generosity. Fairness Concerns: Some donors might perceive donor cover as a surcharge rather than a contribution to the cause. If they feel the charity […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: When writing an appeal, I waffle back and forth between writing “Your gift CAN…” or “Your gift WILL…” Any studies of which of these two words is best for an appeal?

    The choice between “Your gift CAN…” and “Your gift WILL…” taps into the psychological framing of certainty vs. possibility. Currently, there is no academic research directly comparing these two framings in charitable appeals. However, I suspect no framing is universally better—the outcome likely depends on your target audience and the campaign’s goal. Here are some thoughts: Certainty Framing – […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Do you have any insight on whether integrating an individual giving appeal with other comms from the charity in both appearance and messaging can uplift results? Or does the actual appeal become ‘lost’ for lack of stand-out?

    Integrating an individual giving appeal with other communications from a charity can have both positive and negative effects, and the outcome largely depends on how it’s executed. Advantages of Integration Brand Consistency: Maintaining a consistent appearance and messaging across all communications can reinforce the org’s brand identity and strengthen brand recognition and trust among your […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Is there any research on response rate impact in direct mail when referring to a sustainer gift as ongoing or recurring (catching all frequencies) v. monthly or annual?

    I’m not aware of any in-market tests specifically comparing recurring vs. gift frequency language. I suspect the answer might not be the same with all gift frequencies, nor with all people. It sounds like a great opportunity for you to test and find out what works for your audience. Based on the literature, here’s a couple […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: A major conservation nonprofit sends me lots of mail, many of which have on the envelope “time to renew” or “2nd notice.” I find this practice deceptive, especially as I haven’t given to said organization since 1997. It must be effective or they wouldn’t do it. But is it ethical?

    Based on what we know from existing data, those renewal notices can actually be pretty effective in getting people to donate. They tap into our psychology – creating a sense of urgency, reminding us of past support, and using personalization to make the message hit home. They’re playing on our natural tendencies to feel obligated […]

    Read Full Answer

    DonorVoice products

    Commitment System

    Donor Feedback Platform™

    PreTest Tool

    TouchPoint Mapping



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2025, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!