• Home
  • Blog Posts
  • Behavioral Science
  • On Demand Webinars
  • Toolbox
  • Archives

Uncategorized

Substitute Donor For Panelist

Online survey research companies build panels of millions of consumers willing to participate in periodic survey research. They are paid to do so but research shows they also do so out of goodwill. These panel companies are analogous to charities with major acquisition costs and retention issues galore.  Plus, these panel companies use email solicitations […]

Learn More May 22, 2024

We Choose Words, Our Words Reveal Us

Policymakers rely on academic economists to “follow the science” and objectively model out how X impacts Y.   For gosh sakes, they use formal modeling methodologies and other quantitative analysis, all peer reviewed.  In the larger political swamp surely these creatures are the more objective, non-partisan ones. Alas, no.  In novel research published in the Economic […]

Learn More May 20, 2024

Everybody Wants Their Own Toothbrush

Psychologists have introduced thousands of new constructs and measures over the past few decades in their quest to understand human behavior. Check that, it seems to have nothing to do with understanding human behavior, which is, in theory, their job.   Instead, it appears to be the confluence of publisher bias for novelty and everybody wanting […]

Learn More May 17, 2024

Is “Which Test Won?” the Right Question?

Charity X believes in in the importance of a healthy home where families can live together. They provide rehabilitation services to working families who are trying to develop themselves to follow American traditions and support their communities. Charity X believe every person deserves the protection of a home. They provide free critical repairs to the […]

Learn More May 15, 2024

Who Are You?

The Twenty Statements Test (TST) was created by two social psychologists in the 50s’.  Maybe I’m waxing nostalgic but give me the days of low creativity, high literal simplicity in my assessments. The test is nothing more than completing this sentence, “I’m a __________.”  19 times.  Kidding, 20, times, c’mon. It’s an interesting self-reflective exercise […]

Learn More May 10, 2024

An Agitator PSA

Just breathe and repeat after me, Our echo chamber likely hyperfocuses on what separates, ignoring what binds At any given point in a day, only 1% of Americans are watching Fox News, CNN or MSNBC Notice anything in this table of most important issues?  Lots and lots of similarity.   The main differences are between R […]

Learn More May 8, 2024

Chatter vs. Courage: A Rare View of Integrity in Political Fundraising

This morning millions of emails will be waiting in the inboxes of already-annoyed Americans.  Two main broods are responsible: Democrats and Republicans. Also, this morning folks in the southeastern part of the US can steel themselves for the   tens of billions of noisy cicadas—a double emergence of two different broods—are beginning  to pop out of […]

Learn More May 6, 2024

Sham or Lighting Money on Fire?

This is another tilting at windmills post on matching gift offers.  Feel free to tune out, everyone else seems to. Cutting to the chase, the 2x, 3x, 10x…match is either a sham or you like lighting money on fire.  It’s one or the other.   How so? If you can get the same results from a […]

Learn More May 3, 2024

Altruism: The Vanilla Ice Cream of Moral Messaging

People give because they want to help others, feeling a sense of moral obligation or compassion to do so.  Said differently,  donating is an act of altruism or so the thinking goes. Altruism is like vanilla ice cream: classic, dependable… and utterly plain. And the kicker?  If you measure a variety of potential influences on […]

Learn More May 1, 2024

Being Defined As A Donor and More Weak Tea

I’m a dog person and a coffee lover. But being a coffee lover isn’t one of the most important ways I define myself, being a dog person is much more so. This simplistic example illustrates the difference between identity presence, whether one has a certain identity, and identity importance, how central the identity is to […]

Learn More April 29, 2024

<< 1 … 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 … 180 >>

Ask A Behavioral Scientist

    Behavioral Science Q & A

    Q:We are struggling with acquistion. During our biggest community campaign, a colleague is suggesting that we have a QR code directing donors to a donate page that does not capture donor information – just a donation and an email address. We won’t be able to post any of these new doors our lvoely newsletters, or thank you letters. We’ll likely never hear from them again. What’s the best method to get this team to see the importance about a donor vs a donation?

    Thanks so much for raising this. Yes, capturing donor information can be helpful for stewardship like newsletters, thank-you letters, impact updates. But how you ask matters. Forcing full data capture introduces friction that can significantly depress conversion, many donors may simply abandon the process. Beyond the friction itself, required fields also shift the emotional experience […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Should we include “Giving Tuesday” in the subject lines for the emails that are going out before Giving Tuesday?

    Unlike holidays that everyone already knows, Giving Tuesday is a created event. Many donors recognize the name but not the exact timing, so referencing it becomes a helpful cue. It serves as a reminder and taps into social norm activation (“everyone’s giving today”), which boosts response. However, we still want it paired with the mission, […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: can we pull the match language into the subject lines? Or this should be an A/B test?

    When a subject line leads with the match (“Your gift matched!”), it risks triggering market-norm thinking: the sense that giving is a financial transaction rather than an act rooted in values, identity, and care. This shift reduces intrinsic motivation and, over time, can weaken donor satisfaction and long-term engagement. It also makes the email indistinguishable […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Our mid-level donor team removed the QR code from the DM donation form that links to the donation page, but have left the URL for them to type it in manually. Not sure why they are adding a barrier to the donation process for a higher value donor – but I have to ask – is there any proof – either way – if a QR donation code reduces MV online giving, has any effect on their donation amount, has any effect on off line donations? Thank you….

    There’s no evidence that QR codes suppress mid-value giving; all available research suggests they either help or have no negative effect. In fact, behavioral and usability research consistently shows the opposite: reducing friction at any point in the donation process increases completion rates and total response. And that has nothing to do with capacity and […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: How can we effectively use behavioral science to help shift our Board’s mindset. The majority are extremely resistant to asking their networks or sharing their contact lists with us, even after a candid discussion with an external lay leader who has been training boards with her fantastic Fundraising isn’t the F Word! workshop. We have also offered to use our automated email tool to send their appeals from their own email. It is so frustrating. We even have 2 Board members and the chair trying put some accountability on them for our big event but people are not really moving!

    What you’re experiencing is very common. Resistance often isn’t about capability, but about motivation quality. If board members feel pushed into fundraising, that triggers controlled motivation (low quality motivation) i.e. obligation, guilt, or fear of judgment, which often results in avoidance. Instead, we need to create conditions for volitional motivation (high quality motivation) by satisfying […]

    Read Full Answer

    Q: Copywriters often argue the ask should appear on the first page, but that usually breaks the story in two. With a one-sided letter the ask is always on page one, but with a two-sided letter it may fall on the second page—do results differ? Has your appeal structure been tested on both one-sided and two-sided letters? I just read the article Your Appeal Outline: Thoughtful Strategy or Random Spasm?

    That’s a really thoughtful question, and you’re not the first to raise it. Many of our clients have been cautious about placing the ask at the very end. To address their concern, we’ve tested both approaches, and the results are clear: when the ask comes last, even if that means it appears on the second […]

    Read Full Answer

    DonorVoice products

    Commitment System

    Donor Feedback Platform™

    PreTest Tool

    TouchPoint Mapping



      • © Copyright 2005 - 2026, The Agitator. All Rights Reserved.
      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Sitemap
      • RSS Feed
      • We welcome your feedback!